🚀 go-pugleaf

Sergey Karavashkin wrote:
[snip]

> In fact, relation between the Absolute and Relative is determined by
> the permanently moving edge of our knowledge and necessity in some
> basic reference frame which would allow us to generalise in the utmost
> correct way our particular results of studying the physical phenomena.
> So at every stage of physics development, the concept of the absolute
> reference frame reflects the highest level of knowledge of the stage.
> At the today level it would be quite admissible to use, as an approach
> to the absolute reference system, some system related to the aether in
> the surrounding us near space.
[snip]

I have hermetically isolated three orthogonal accelerometers
(mechanical inertial or ring gyro optical phase at your whim, or three
of each).  What they sense is absolute.  Everything else is relative. 
It is that simple.

Pick your property, stick your detector(s) into a hermetically sealed
box.  You either get a signal or not.  It is that simple.  Every other
embellishment is crap.  The aether is particularly loathsome,
empirically falsified crap from Hipparchos star positions shifted by
General Relativity for up to 90 degrees from the solar limb to 

Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1) 010401 (2002)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(9) 549 (1979)
Phys. Bull. 21 255 (1970)

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
 (Do something naughty to physics)

-- 
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"  The Net!