🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #15255

Re: Notes on physical Absolute

#15255
From: Mitchell Jones
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:00
52 lines
3936 bytes
In article <3E3478B6.255619D5@hate.spam.net>, Uncle Al
<UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:

> Sergey Karavashkin wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> > In fact, relation between the Absolute and Relative is determined by
> > the permanently moving edge of our knowledge and necessity in some
> > basic reference frame which would allow us to generalise in the utmost
> > correct way our particular results of studying the physical phenomena.
> > So at every stage of physics development, the concept of the absolute
> > reference frame reflects the highest level of knowledge of the stage.
> > At the today level it would be quite admissible to use, as an approach
> > to the absolute reference system, some system related to the aether in
> > the surrounding us near space.
> [snip]
> 
> I have hermetically isolated three orthogonal accelerometers
> (mechanical inertial or ring gyro optical phase at your whim, or three
> of each).  What they sense is absolute.  Everything else is relative. 
> It is that simple.
> 
> Pick your property, stick your detector(s) into a hermetically sealed
> box.  You either get a signal or not.  It is that simple.  Every other
> embellishment is crap.  The aether is particularly loathsome,
> empirically falsified crap from Hipparchos star positions shifted by
> General Relativity for up to 90 degrees from the solar limb

***{All the Hipparchos satellite has done is expand the range of space
over which light bending can be observed from a few solar radii to most of
the celestial sphere, Al. It added nothing to the already rock-solid proof
of the phenomenon, and did nothing to alter the fact that general
relativity is just a magical "explanation" of a bunch of experimentally
derived equations that a proper aether theory explains without recourse to
magic. If, for example, the explanation of the so called "gravitational
light bending" predicted by those equations lies in the lensing effects of
pools of gravitationally entrained aether surrounding stars, rather than
in "curved space," then the Hipparchos results *confirm* the existence of
the aether, now don't they? :-) --MJ}***

 to 
> 
> Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1) 010401 (2002)
> Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(9) 549 (1979)
> Phys. Bull. 21 255 (1970)
> 
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
>  (Do something naughty to physics)

===============================================
Killfile inmates: Charles Cagle, Stephen Speicher, Mati Meron, Franz
Heymann, Mike Varney, Dirk Van de moortel, Bob Zombiewoof.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <mjones-2701030100110001@66-105-229-9-aus-02.cvx.algx.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!sfo2-feed1.news.algx.net!dca1-feed2.news.algx.net!dca1-feed1.news.algx.net!allegiance!dca1-nnrp1.news.algx.net.POSTED!66-105-229-9-aus-02.cvx.algx.net!user
References: <1305a9da.0301261524.4d6171c7@posting.google.com> <3E3478B6.255619D5@hate.spam.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 111f18,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid111f18,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public
X-Google-Thread: 106ae0,cfdcd85d3ce06e78
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ae0,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-26 23:01:17 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!sfo2-feed1.news.algx.net!dca1-feed2.news.algx.net!dca1-feed1.news.algx.net!allegiance!dca1-nnrp1.news.algx.net.POSTED!66-105-229-9-aus-02.cvx.algx.net!user
From: mjones@jump.net (Mitchell Jones)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,alt.consciousness,fj.sci.matter
Subject: Re: Notes on physical Absolute
Message-ID: <mjones-2701030100110001@66-105-229-9-aus-02.cvx.algx.net>
References: <1305a9da.0301261524.4d6171c7@posting.google.com> <3E3478B6.255619D5@hate.spam.net>
Organization: 21st Century Logic
Lines: 52
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:00:30 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.105.229.9
X-Complaints-To: abuse@algx.net
X-Trace: dca1-nnrp1.news.algx.net 1043650830 66.105.229.9 (Mon, 27 Jan 2003 02:00:30 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 02:00:30 EST