🚀 go-pugleaf

selflab@go.com (Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<1305a9da.0301261524.4d6171c7@posting.google.com>...
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> We published a new paper
> 
> " Notes on physical Absolute " 
> 
> in our journal "SELF Transactions", volume 3 (2003), issue 1 
> 
> *Abstract*
> 
> Basing on the analysis of theoretical construction and experimental
> results, this paper shows that Mach's debunking the Newtonian
> "Absolute" originated the new Einsteinian "absolute" in the form of
> Minkowski 4D space-time metric which has caused only the primitivism
> in physics and impeded its development.
> In fact, relation between the Absolute and Relative is determined by
> the permanently moving edge of our knowledge and necessity in some
> basic reference frame which would allow us to generalise in the utmost
> correct way our particular results of studying the physical phenomena.
> So at every stage of physics development, the concept of the absolute
> reference frame reflects the highest level of knowledge of the stage.
> At the today level it would be quite admissible to use, as an approach
> to the absolute reference system, some system related to the aether in
> the surrounding us near space.
> 
> Please enjoy reading full text:
> 
> http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/v3_1/contents3.html#absolute
> 
> I hope, it will be interesting for many of you, and look forward to
> hear your opinion.
> 
> Sergey.

[EL]
LOL.
Congratulations Sergey.
I agree, you did a very good job, but your English proficiency stinks,
and I am sure that your Russian must be better. :)
I realized that you agree with me completely on my interpretation of
the Fizeau experiment, and that frequency is a critical criterion on
SR/GR refutation. So what were you doing trolling me! or do you deny
me the right to have similar intelligence to yours. :)

Kind regards.

EL