🚀 go-pugleaf

Dear Richard,

I looked thorough your paper and regret to say, I did not found the
substantiation which you were telling about in your post. Moreover, in
your approach to the conductors with the current and their interaction
you omitted a few important issues. Should you take them into account,
they would fully change your computations. I'm sending you by e-mail a
copy of your paper with inserted my particular comments and hope, you
will take it favourably. If you take into account what I show you, you
will see, how the phenomenology of process will change before your
eyes.

If we were speaking of serious development of our understanding in
magnetostatics, we have to take another trend. I'm aware, there exists
and is commonly used such approach - to "pull out" a new knowledge and
concepts of processes from the known formulas, but this never gave new
results. We have to seek the new in the area where the formulas are
absent yet! The formula per se is a dogma formulated at the already
achieved level of knowledge. To surmount the dogma - means to surmount
the formula! This is just the complication of development. I would
like much to avoid your misunderstanding. At due time I felt offensive
too when was taught the same things. I have got my arrogance over and
tried to understand my teachers; now I'm thankful them that they
opened me this simple true - and it opens the door of knowledge. So I
hope, you will take my words with open heart.

With best wishes,

Sergey.