🚀 go-pugleaf

root@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge) wrote in message news:<slrnb4c0i7.o6j.root@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>...
> Sergey Karavashkin said some stuff about
> COMPARISON OF TRANSVERSAL ACOUSTIC AND EM WAVES to usenet:
>  >Dear Colleagues,
>  >
>  >We published in our e-journal  "SELF Transactions", volume 3 (2003)
>  >our new paper
>  >
>  >S.B. Karavashkin and O.N. Karavashkina. 
>  >COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPAGATION VELOCITIES OF TRANSVERSAL
>  >ACOUSTIC WAVES AND TRANSVERSAL EM WAVES IN THE NEAR FIELD
>  >
> 
>   Your attempt to say that treating light as photons is untenable, is
> based upon an entirely untenable model of photons. While it's true that
> Atsukovsky's model is untenable, most of his assumptions are wrong and
> even conflict with the ones that are right. For example, if photons had a
> mass, the spin could take on three values, 1,0,-1, not two. It's a vector
> and all three projections differ only by a rotation of the axes. All you
> can say is that his model is untenable, which is obvious from the
> assumptions.

Three states of photon in a transverse wave? At uneven velocity in the
near field? Massif photon? Perhaps now you will classify it as a
hyperon? ;-) Have we at all analysed in our paper the photon
polarisation? In that number in Atsukovsky's conception. Whether our
analysis relates only to Atsukovsky? Or to a photon as the whole? Your
blindness is so usual for me that does not surprise, only shows again:
the essence of problem is of no importance for you, you have no idea
of argumentation. For you it is the same as to substitute your wave
function into the Schroedinger equation. Eh, Bilge, Bilge! Was it the
aim of your life to confine yourself to write nonsense, humiliating
yourself! Understanding, this what you write is nonsense. Don't
humiliate yourself, and you will never have the reason to complain
that you are offended, as you did it in one of threads. It only seems
that impudence and boorishness win. No, they obliterate those who
boor.

Sergey.