🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 17, 7:23 am, Ian Parker <ianpark...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 Jul, 02:59, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 6:26 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > > Yanick Toutain wrote:
>
> > > [snip rest of crap]
>
> > > > Michelson and Morley and Miller were wrong about that: They ignored
> > > > the motion of the Sun.
>
> > >    1) Michelson-Morley, 1887, no aether to differential 10^(-8)
>
> > >    2) 2002, no aether to differential 1.7x10^(-15),
>
> > > Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1) 010401 (2002)
>
> > >    3) 2007, no aether to differential 10^(-16),
>
> > >http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
> > > Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 050401 (2007)
>
> > > Two simultaneous interferometers ==> over a year's observation <==:
> > > Optical in Berlin, Germany at 52°31'N 13°20'E and microwave in Perth,
> > > Australia at 31°53'S 115°53E. An aether background could never be at
> > > rest relative to both of them.  No vacuum dispersion, no vacuum
> > > dichroism.
>
> > >    4) Fucking imbecile.
>
> > > --
> > > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> > >  (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
>
> > Dear Uncle Al:  The ether flow at the Earth's surface is straight
> > down. That's what causes the force of gravity.  Interferometer
> > experiments expecting to detect ether that is just waiting in Earth's
> > path, don't take into account that ether rotates WITH the Earth and
> > flows straight down.  At higher distances the ether flow is at an
> > angle.  Think of this like looking at storm systems on Earth.
> > Understanding ether flow is really like understanding weather
> > systems.  — NoEinstein —- Hide quoted text -
>
> Look experiments have been performed where light passes a rotating
> disc. If there was even a modicum of truth in this light would travel
> at a different speed near a rotating object.
>
> No, as we have said time after time what we are seeing is an organized
> disinformation campaign. Facts are irrelevant.
>
>   - Ian Parker
>
> Regardez expériences ont été effectuées où la lumière passe à un
> disque tournant. Si il y avait même un minimum de vérité dans vos
> theories, cette lumière voyage à une vitesse différente à proximité
> d'un objet en rotation.
>
> Non, comme nous l'avons dit maintes fois ce que nous voyons est
> organisé une campagne de désinformation. Les faits ne sont pas
> pertinentes.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dear Ian:  Propellers that turn too fast will cavitate, rather than
move the boat forward.  The ether will cavitate, too.  It's not
physically connected to that rotating disk.  But the ether flowing
into the Earth does delay or speed up the passage of light or radio
waves—as from GPS satellites.  Single cases that aren't confirmed,
don't rule out the other cases that are.  — NoEinstein —