🚀 go-pugleaf

http://fr.babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-home&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fgroup%2Fsci.physics%2Fbrowse_thread%2Fthread%2Ffff37f97d254b4ac%3Fhl%3Dfr%23&lp=fr_en&btnTrUrl=Traduire

lang=en

PSEUDO QUANTUM INDÉTERMINISME
I finished, this morning, at 7 a.m., the reconstitution of the
protocol
experimental in the magazine the search for April 2008 (pages
describes
31 to 46).
The authors Anton Zeilinger and Markus Aspelmeyer are two orthodoxe
Austrians. They claim to put realism low.
Their proof: two groups of photons are emitted by a laser towards two
possible ways (discriminated by a semi-reflective mirror), but
only one side or other is detected, but not on the two sides
at the same time.
An analysis materialist described, within the framework of the
assumption Ain Al
Rami, which the detectors will receive.
It is a question of placing their device in the absolute space of
Newton, of
to consider that their device has an absolute translation of 5011
kilometers a second.
And to examine the photons which will reach or not the detector
final.
Any scientist will understand that detectors
insufficiently broad (or of too small mirrors) will let pass
the photons and will not detect them. (during their way, they
do not reach the centers of the intermediate mirrors because of
our absolute translation)


For a square device measuring 3 meters on side, table Ci
below the percentage of fictitious success indicates: The tests are
carried out (in calculation) for 36 positions of the device,
incremented by
not 10 degrees.
A receiver measuring 10 centimetres will take delivery of.
7 photons of the way of left
5 photons of the way of right-hand side
2 pairs of photons arriving (almost) at the same moment, and by
left way and by the way right-hand side.
22 case of absence of reception.
There are thus 36 positions.
7+5 correspond to the choices of Zeilinger and Aspelmeyer: 12 cases
of
reception by only one way.
2 cases correspond to their “failure”.
There are thus (from their point of view) 14 meaning cases from where
they have
extract 12 success.
12/14 gives a percentage (fictitious) of 85.71%.


The scientist materialist will note that more the mirror is broad
and more percentage of chance to take delivery of the photons on
two ways increases. And thus protocol of Zeilinger and Aspelmeyer
is depend on the width on the mirrors and final sensors.


One finds the same error as in the protocol of Michelson and
Morley: the immobilists did not imagine " only one second does it
that our absolute velocity could approximate the 100° or even the 60°
speed of light.


It is damage which the article does not give of detail: there is only
one
drawing representing their device.


The materialists will be able to recover their data to prove our
absolute velocity.


blogspot lost my model: the two columns follow one another.
reader will rectifira. I do not have time to rectify since the cyber.


width of the final target (cm)
for a square of 3 side m
percentage of fictitious “success” of the orthodoxe ones


1
100,00%
2
100,00%
3
100,00%
4
100,00%
5
100,00%
6
100,00%
7
91,67%
8
83,33%
9
84,62%
10
85,71%
11
78,57%
12
66,67%
13
56,25%
14
56,25%
15
56,25%
16
63,16%
17
50,00%
18
45,00%
19
45,00%
20
52,17%
21
45,83%
22
41,67%
23
41,67%
24
42,86%
25
39,29%
26
33,33%
27
35,48%
28
31,43%
29
27,78%
30
22,22%
31
19,44%
32
5,56%
33
5,56%
34
5,56%
35
5,56%
36
5,56%
37
5,56%
38
5,56%
39
5,56%
40
5,56%


The wording: Anton Zeilinger, absolute space, indeterminism, Isaac
Newton, Markus Aspelmeyer, orthodoxe, physics, quantum