Article View: sci.physics
Article #15817Re: in static space ? , 在静态空间 ?
From: Yanick Toutain
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 00:15
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 00:15
46 lines
3182 bytes
3182 bytes
On 2 mai, 01:25, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote: > Michael Helland wrote: > > > The beginning of Newton's Principia defined time and space as being > > both absolute and relative: > > Observations show that is wrong. You are a joker !!! 6,3 billion inhabitants of the Earth can look at the sun by the window. They see the sun RELATIVE with THEIR window. Each one his. It is what Newton wrote. (It also knows that the window advances, in the vacuum, of an absolute place to another absolute place) And you would have evidence that all that would be false? We would like to know this “evidence”!!!!! To laugh! Vous êtes un plaisantin ! 6,3 milliards d'habitants de la Terre peuvent regarder le soleil par la fenêtre. Ils voient le soleil RELATIVEMENT à LEUR fenêtre. Chacun la sienne. C'est ce que Newton a écrit. (Il sait aussi que la fenêtre avance, dans le vide, d'un lieu absolu à un autre lieu absolu) Et vous auriez des preuves que tout cela serait faux ? Nous aimerions connaître ces "preuves" !!!!! Pour rire ! ============ I ask for to the referees of the forum “sci.logic” to affirm the nonsense of the contribution of Sam Wormley and his incomprehension of the text of Newton. Je demande aux arbitres du forum "sci.logic" d'affirmer l'absurdité de la contribution de Sam Wormley et son incompréhension du texte de Newton.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<e1f37444-6358-4955-b860-fc22f0101836@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<d31fd906-37ec-4529-b00f-1226445308a8@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <9a32c839-142f-40d0-8b91-239e21ebd1de@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <868b088f-1973-4353-bc70-511580d80877@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <MjsSj.145456$yE1.109239@attbi_s21>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,64dccde4a3c3b3fe X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,9e5668b31e038424 X-Google-Thread: 111645,9e5668b31e038424 X-Google-Thread: 10cc56,9e5668b31e038424 X-Google-Thread: f8805,9e5668b31e038424 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid111645,gid10cc56,gidf8805,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Yanick Toutain <YanickToutain@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.logic,tw.bbs.sci.physics Subject: Re: in static space ? , 在静态空间 ? Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 17:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 46 Message-ID: <e1f37444-6358-4955-b860-fc22f0101836@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> References: <d31fd906-37ec-4529-b00f-1226445308a8@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <9a32c839-142f-40d0-8b91-239e21ebd1de@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <868b088f-1973-4353-bc70-511580d80877@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <MjsSj.145456$yE1.109239@attbi_s21> NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.68.208.8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1209687346 23990 127.0.0.1 (2 May 2008 00:15:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 00:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.68.208.8; posting-account=1qbAGAkAAADcUtlizzXUEb5jUjfAdE2y User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)