🚀 go-pugleaf

Cleaned of GFI:--

"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:9PUMi.27309$Ww5.26340@trnddc03...
> "Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li" <chris.marx@tiscalinet.ch> wrote in 
> news:47040443$1_1@news.tiscalinet.ch...
>>
> "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:GLPMi.4102$n92.1695@trnddc06...
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/574562ba878ee738
>>
> "Other Me" <none@abuse.net> wrote in message news:fe0c0n$fks$1@aioe.org...
>>
> "Weiv" <weiv@isp.com> wrote in message
> news:c5a87$4703a279$d8080e0b$28999@DIALUPUSA.NET...
> "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
>>
> "Other Me" <none@abuse.net> wrote
> No.  End of story.  Leave this newsgroup immediately.
>>
> [hanson]
> ... ahahahaha... Hodidoh!... FIRST prove to Weiv that when
> you step out of a 5th floor window, jump and report back to
> us after you made contact with the first electron clouds of the
> Al-Ca-silicates on the side walk concrete surface that it was
> indeed NOT the end of YOUR story.
>
[...]
>>
> [Chris Marx]
> You're outing your usual sci.idiocy. Why not OPEN YOUR EYES
> & LOOK at bipolar substance-relevant variabel gravitation on the
> online GFMI-graphs? Gravitation is bipolar vortex-driven, the
> inturning vortex pressing down on your ass, the outturning one
> pressing it up, & in between the difference between them (according
> to SGR simultaneously) providing you with your ass' own-weight.
>>
> As explained in just 1 page in [ www.sources.li/gfmi-proof.pdf ]
> (given you have learned how to move the cursor to a link).
>>
> [hanson]
> [...]
>
> I tell you now for the 5th time, Chris, ******** explain to me in 20 lines
> or less WITHOUT refering to any links (urls) why there should be a
> "multiple c" that can/has been measured. *******

I have done so:

| "Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li" <chris.marx@paf.li> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:fdrhh4$h8b$2@atlas.ip-plus.net...
| > "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
| > news:Lg1Ki.3017$9r4.1637@trnddc04...
| >
| > You want to know _why_ there should be multi-c in nature?
| > The fact that there is & that it can/has been measured
| > transporting signals, energy & momentum I find sufficient
| > for my modest requirement of fabricating a simple
| > contraption for getting to another star for some well earned
| > holidays [from sci.idiots] -- what more do you want?
| > & _why_ there is this aggregate state of electricity called
| > gravitation (or space _per se_ if you prefer)? Because
| > nature does everything in the most simple way possible,
| > so simple in fact that there simply isn't a more simple way.
| > Obviously gravitation is keeping the universe going &
| > allows intelligences to use it for adventurous undertakings.
| > Why? I couldn't care less.

> If you can't do that then all your UQT, EVU, GFI, GFMI, SGR & LQS
> are just different variants of stinky cheese... or shit like somebody
> else said... ahahaha... Thanks for the laughs, Chris... ahahahanson
>>
>
> [PS]
> Your less then splendid explaination of "bipolar vortex-driven gravity"
> is remisicent of your ilk-man's, G=EMC^2' concave/convex space-time.
> Get him, Herbert Glaser, to study your cheese... ahahaha...

++++

EVU = Electric Vortex Universe;
cf www.paf.li/perceptions.htm

SGR = Substance-relevant Gravitational Resonance
cf www.sources.li/SGR-e.pdf

GFMI = Gravitational Field Measuring Instrument:
cf www.sources.li/gfmi-proof.pdf,
www.sources.li/physical-congress-2006.pdf,
www.paf.li/gfmi-e.pdf;
output of experiment online in
http://evu.paf.li, substance-relevant in
http://evu.paf.li/rrd/hg.html - Mercury
http://evu.paf.li/rrd/cu.html - Copper
http://evu.paf.li/rrd/sn.html - Tin
http://evu.paf.li/rrd/pb.html - Lead

LQS = Logical Qualitative System

UQT = Unlogical Quantitative Theories
(cf http://www.paf.li/Quantification.pdf)

ICS = Informed Common Sense

GFI  = [Hanson's] Goofy Fuck Ideas