Article View: sci.physics
Article #15890Re: Was Einstein totally and completely wrong?
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:52
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:52
29 lines
3082 bytes
3082 bytes
On 17 Sept, 06:25, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in sci.physics: > Alen wrote: > > On Sep 16, 1:55 pm, "Bill Hobba" <rubb...@junk.com> wrote: > >> See the following ancient but IMHO still excellent > >> post by Tom Roberts: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/a1b1aa766a22394b?hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1 > > I wrote that more than 15 years ago, when I was just beginning to become > re-interested in physics after a hiatus of many years. I had A LOT to > learn at that time, and I cringe a bit whenever Bill posts a reference > to it. While it displays the basic idea, its attempt at rigor fails. It > was indeed based on "dimly remembered ideas from graduate school" (at > the time ~20 years earlier, so they must have stuck pretty well but not > perfectly (:-)). Don't worry Roberts Roberts people will understand your problem. 15 years ago you started studying physics and naturally you could not know anything about the discovery of Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond and Jong- Ping Hsu. However in 2006 you were educated enough and even became a coauthor: http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/34d4b543c9ed073e? So when your student Dirk Moortel started glorifying you, nobody protested: http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/21a8122a2f8e1d44? Pentcho Valev
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1190004749.946985.194970@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1189894126.334713.144020@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <aP1Hi.1336$9r.943@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1189951050.629379.275140@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <%knHi.3122$ZA5.1206@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e8e882616d52a9aa X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e8e882616d52a9aa X-Google-Thread: f74ae,ef6609976da013ac,start X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,ef6609976da013ac,start X-Google-Thread: 111645,ef6609976da013ac,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid10f545,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid111645,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique Subject: Re: Was Einstein totally and completely wrong? Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:52:29 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 31 Message-ID: <1190004749.946985.194970@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <1189894126.334713.144020@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <aP1Hi.1336$9r.943@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1189951050.629379.275140@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <%knHi.3122$ZA5.1206@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.136 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1190004750 21995 127.0.0.1 (17 Sep 2007 04:52:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:52:30 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <%knHi.3122$ZA5.1206@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.136; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0