Re: A second "big bang"

Article View: sci.physics

Article #16043

#16043

From: Uncle Al
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:35

22 lines
2222 bytes

The Dark Doctor wrote:
> 
> I'm looking for information on what specific types of conditions would be
> necessary for a second "big bang" to be triggered in the universe.

Depends on the size you want.  Brookhaven National Laboratory smashing
ultra-relativistic gold nuclei will give you little Big Bangs.  Every
Planck-scale spacetime fluctuation is an ultimately small Big Bang -
which may be a full sized one.  Perhaps physical reality is a
reciprocal lattice, and the smallest ones are the biggest ones.  OTOH,
since that gets things really crowded really quickly (Planck
frequency!), maybe Kuratowski's theorem delimits the conditions
necessary for a persistent pop.  No tangle, no tango.

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
 (Do something naughty to physics)

-- 
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"  The Net!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3E3FEC1F.952CFB44@hate.spam.net>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!west.cox.net!cox.net!p01!news2.west.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail

References: <b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 111645,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gid111645,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-04 08:37:12 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!west.cox.net!cox.net!p01!news2.west.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3E3FEC1F.952CFB44@hate.spam.net>
From: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net>
Organization: The Noble Krell
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.astrophysique
Subject: Re: A second "big bang"
References: <b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:35:15 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.5.243.16
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net
X-Trace: news2.west.cox.net 1044376515 68.5.243.16 (Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:35:15 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:35:15 EST

Reply to Parent Message