🚀 go-pugleaf

Dr. Henri Wilson skrev:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:38:22 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
> <paul.b.andersen@guesswhatuia.no> wrote:
> 
>> Dr. Henri Wilson skrev:
>>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:58:42 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
>>> <paul.b.andersen@guesswhatuia.no> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dr. Henri Wilson skrev:
>>>>> There is a simple reason why the GR redshift is the same as the BaTh one.
>>>>> Along with the rest of its insanity, GR distorts space so that falling light
>>>>> retains a constant light speed whilst BaTh does not promote such a delusion.
>>>>>
>>>>> The end result is naturally the same....so are the equations.
>>>> PBA:
>>>> | You can't make a continuous wave increase its frequency
>>>> | by speeding it up. It is the wavelength that will change.
>>>>
>>>> HW:
>>>> | Correct, I demonstrated that with my animation
>>>> | http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/fallingwave.exe
>>>>
>>>> PBA:
>>>> | So you agree that "falling light" and the BaTh can't explain
>>>> | the gravitational frequency shift.
>>>>
>>>> HW:
>>>> | Yes...for individual photons but not radio signals.
>>>>
>>>> That's why it is _blatantly_ obvious to anyone with some measure
>>>> of intelligence that since frequencies and wavelengths factually
>>>> are gravitationally shifted, Galilean relativity is falsified.
>>>
>>> Where is the believable evidence that radio signals are doppler shifted due to
>>> 'falling'? You have none.
>> And the reason why the observed gravitational frequency shift
>> of the radio signals from gravity probe A isn't 'believable' is:
>>
>>> How many band pass filters are accurate to 10^-11.
>> .. the bandpass filters in the gravity probe A experiment
>> changed the frequency of the received signal.
>> Wonderland fairies in the filters inserted extra cycles.
>> Right? :-)
>>
>> Keep it up, Henri.
>> I am sure you can do even better.
>> The sky is the limit! :-)
> 
> How much does the 'finely tuned cavity' change in free fall? 
> 
> Certainly more than 1 in 10^10 


The 'bandpass filter changing the frequency' didn't work.
So what else can we blame it on?
Ah.
'The finely tuned cavity' which determine the frequency
of the hyperfine transition in the hydrogen maser of course!

Well done, Henri.
This was indeed even better.

But keep keeping it up, Henri.
I am sure you can do even better.
You have reached the Moon, but the sky is the limit!

-- 
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/