🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:58:42 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@guesswhatuia.no> wrote:

>Dr. Henri Wilson skrev:
>> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:28:30 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
>> <paul.b.andersen@guesswhatuia.no> wrote:
>> 
>>> Max Keon skrev:
>>>> "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@guesswhatuia.no> wrote in message
>>>> news:47B0B5D6.5080404@guesswhatuia.no...
>>>>> Max Keon wrote:
>>>>>> Eric Gisse wrote:
>>>>>>> Max Keon wrote:
>>>> ---
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>>  http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/redshft2.html
>>>>   (Image dimensions can only be specified in html)
>>>>
>>>> That's another impossibility that is _blatantly_ obvious to
>>>> anyone with some measure of intelligence, by the way. Perhaps
>>>> you should think about that too.
>>> Sure, if you postulate that Galilean relativity applies,
>>> it is indeed _blatantly_ obvious impossible.
>>>
>>> That's why it is _blatantly_ obvious to anyone with some measure
>>> of intelligence that since frequencies and wavelengths factually
>>> are gravitationally shifted, Galilean relativity is falsified.
>>>
>>> You seem to have a lot in common with Henri Wilson. :-)
>> 
>> There is a simple reason why the GR redshift is the same as the BaTh one.
>> Along with the rest of its insanity, GR distorts space so that falling light
>> retains a constant light speed whilst BaTh does not promote such a delusion.
>> 
>> The end result is naturally the same....so are the equations.
>
>PBA:
>| You can't make a continuous wave increase its frequency
>| by speeding it up. It is the wavelength that will change.
>
>HW:
>| Correct, I demonstrated that with my animation
>| http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/fallingwave.exe
>
>PBA:
>| So you agree that "falling light" and the BaTh can't explain
>| the gravitational frequency shift.
>
>HW:
>| Yes...for individual photons but not radio signals.
>
>That's why it is _blatantly_ obvious to anyone with some measure
>of intelligence that since frequencies and wavelengths factually
>are gravitationally shifted, Galilean relativity is falsified.


Where is the believable evidence that radio signals are doppler shifted due to
'falling'? You have none.

How many band pass filters are accurate to 10^-11.



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's  Relativity is easy to understand if one has the IQ of a parrot and a gullibility index >0.95.