🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #16300

Re: Pound Rebka

#16300
From: Eric Gisse
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:30
58 lines
4808 bytes
On Jan 22, 2:44 am, "Max Keon" <maxk...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:87303ba1-5ad7-47a5-87e5-842267d168b0@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Max Keon wrote:
> >>>> The CMBR began its journey in a VERY redshifted state and has
> >>>> been progressively redshifted along the way by the expansion.
>
> >>>> Do you understand now why the CMBR would be almost impossible to
> >>>> detect in a big bang universe ?
>
> >>> You are a bleeding moron. The CMBR has been detected many times over
> >>> the past 40 years.
>
> >> Yes, it has. But what is detected today requires that spectral
> >> line frequencies generated when the CMBR was first transmitted
> >> be exactly what they are when generated in today's environment.
> >> That's hardly likely when the mass of the entire universe was
> >> within, at most, 10000000 * 2 light years of everything.
>
> >> Can't you see that?
> > Your argument would be more meaningful if you had a calculation
> > supporting it. Especially if the argument wasn't that we cannot
> > possibly be observing what has been routinely observed.
>
> I routinely observe the Sun going around the Earth every day and
> I can draw all kinds of conclusions from this. But when the
> complete picture is taken into account, I know that the Earth is
> simply revolving on its axis.
>
> On the other hand, you can routinely observe a fairly uniform
> radiation arriving from all directions, and you conclude that
> this was generated at the time when the universe first became
> transparent. But you have constructed a complete picture to suit
> your needs. You have chosen to ignore the VERY OBVIOUS fact that
> (if the initial expansion was at the speed of light), all matter
> in the universe was within 300000 light years of the big bang,
> or within 600000 light years of every scrap of matter that
> existed, and that represents a gigantic gravity well compared
> with the universe today.
>
> Every natural oscillator is affected by every bit of matter in
> the universe. If the mass of the currently visible universe is
> i.e. 5e+56 kilograms, and all of that mass resided in a thin
> shell at the visible extremes, at a 13 billion light year radius,
> or 1.23e+26 meters, clock running speed is  t' = t/(G*M/(c^2*r))
>  t' = 3.32e-4 of what it would be in a universe where only the
> clock exists.

When you learn to stop pulling equations out of your ass, let me know
and this can continue.

[snip remaining, unread]
Technical Details
Message-ID: <84c8c8de-d68c-4319-998a-475f9783b160@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <f406338a-c84f-4ffb-b26f-91cc1ecb7376@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <477e1a68$0$25819$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <30d40ddf-3af0-4765-9287-ca83ba2b25a5@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <478166dc$0$26468$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <34c68db5-b7b4-4d60-9c7e-c0b926b11e20@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <478430c3$0$20842$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3d00832e-aaab-4322-b3d2-bbbbbe9ef0ee@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478756ed$0$4437$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <fa4863cc-d511-40ee-949d-acba1dd9ba22@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478c24de$0$12542$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <e8b3af7c-b183-4a3c-b32c-9a962bd0d138@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478fd5e3$0$25392$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <87303ba1-5ad7-47a5-87e5-842267d168b0@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <4795d722$0$13262$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b6602ccd7db217eb
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,b6602ccd7db217eb
X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,b6602ccd7db217eb
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,78e626584bab1101
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,78e626584bab1101
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid10f545,gid106b5d,gidfa4c1,gidf74ae,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.org.mensa, 
 fr.sci.physique, sci.astro
Subject: Re: Pound Rebka
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <84c8c8de-d68c-4319-998a-475f9783b160@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
References: <f406338a-c84f-4ffb-b26f-91cc1ecb7376@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> 
 <477e1a68$0$25819$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <30d40ddf-3af0-4765-9287-ca83ba2b25a5@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <478166dc$0$26468$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <34c68db5-b7b4-4d60-9c7e-c0b926b11e20@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <478430c3$0$20842$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3d00832e-aaab-4322-b3d2-bbbbbe9ef0ee@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <478756ed$0$4437$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <fa4863cc-d511-40ee-949d-acba1dd9ba22@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <478c24de$0$12542$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <e8b3af7c-b183-4a3c-b32c-9a962bd0d138@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <478fd5e3$0$25392$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <87303ba1-5ad7-47a5-87e5-842267d168b0@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 <4795d722$0$13262$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.229.60.138
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1201019419 15406 127.0.0.1 (22 Jan 2008 16:30:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:30:19 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.229.60.138; 
 posting-account=rIfu6QoAAAD5nXG3h9QEE0J3dZn1U45R
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) 
 Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)