Article View: sci.physics
Article #16302Re: Pound Rebka
From: nonsense
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:40
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:40
79 lines
4714 bytes
4714 bytes
Eric Gisse wrote: > On Jan 17, 1:25 pm, "Max Keon" <maxk...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > [snip] > > >>>>>>So what would the CMBR look like now? It would be virtually >>>>>>impossible to detect, wouldn't it! >> >>>>The CMBR began its journey in a VERY redshifted state and has >>>>been progressively redshifted along the way by the expansion. >> >>>>Do you understand now why the CMBR would be almost impossible to >>>>detect in a big bang universe ? >>> >>>You are a bleeding moron. The CMBR has been detected many times over >>>the past 40 years. >> >>Yes, it has. But what is detected today requires that spectral >>line frequencies generated when the CMBR was first transmitted >>be exactly what they are when generated in today's environment. >>That's hardly likely when the mass of the entire universe was >>within, at most, 10000000 * 2 light years of everything. >> >>Can't you see that? > > > Your argument would be more meaningful if you had a calculation > supporting it. Especially if the argument wasn't that we cannot > possibly be observing what has been routinely observed. We know what we are observing. Without offering support for any one underlying theory over another, I say that we have merely plugged CMBR into the current working theories about the universe rather than looking seriously outside the current popular box. So to clarify: We know what we are observing and we *think* we know what that means. One rather large issue in science is to consider alternative theories, realizing that we're not all that far away from having given up the idea of a steady state universe. Cranks abound, that's for sure. Which of them, if any, is a modern day Galileo? Alas, our lives are too short. I am not satisfied with the present explanation of CMBR (along with a lot of other things.) This forum is not the place to settle such issues nor will I engage anyone on the matter lest some of you take the equivalent position of a Father Grassi as several participants in sci newsgroups are so fond of doing. (Trust me, that is not a career builder.) >>>>But if spectral lines were generated on the same principle as >>>>i.e. gamma rays from radioactive iron, they would begin their >>>>post CMBR journey in a VERY blueshifted state and, through the >>>>expansion, would be redshifted back toward how they appear here >>>>in the present. >> >>>>Some X-ray stars are going to confuse the hell out of you. >> >>>>----- >> >>>>Max Keon > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<f2e6e$47907412$49e5d4e$29163@DIALUPUSA.NET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out03a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in03.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!DIALUPUSA.NET!not-for-mailReferences:
<f406338a-c84f-4ffb-b26f-91cc1ecb7376@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <b07d7181-f8a8-4f52-93dc-d5b7b7420cbc@z26g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <b930fba9-5f1e-4c26-91eb-98187bc04562@e26g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <477e1a68$0$25819$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <30d40ddf-3af0-4765-9287-ca83ba2b25a5@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <478166dc$0$26468$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <34c68db5-b7b4-4d60-9c7e-c0b926b11e20@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <478430c3$0$20842$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3d00832e-aaab-4322-b3d2-bbbbbe9ef0ee@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478756ed$0$4437$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <fa4863cc-d511-40ee-949d-acba1dd9ba22@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478c24de$0$12542$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <e8b3af7c-b183-4a3c-b32c-9a962bd0d138@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478fd5e3$0$25392$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <87303ba1-5ad7-47a5-87e5-842267d168b0@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b6602ccd7db217eb X-Google-Thread: 10f545,b6602ccd7db217eb X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,b6602ccd7db217eb X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,78e626584bab1101 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,78e626584bab1101 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid10f545,gid106b5d,gidfa4c1,gidf74ae,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out03a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in03.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!DIALUPUSA.NET!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:40:51 -0600 From: nonsense <nonsense@unsettled.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,rec.org.mensa,fr.sci.physique,sci.astro Subject: Re: Pound Rebka References: <f406338a-c84f-4ffb-b26f-91cc1ecb7376@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <b07d7181-f8a8-4f52-93dc-d5b7b7420cbc@z26g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <b930fba9-5f1e-4c26-91eb-98187bc04562@e26g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <477e1a68$0$25819$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <30d40ddf-3af0-4765-9287-ca83ba2b25a5@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <478166dc$0$26468$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <34c68db5-b7b4-4d60-9c7e-c0b926b11e20@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <478430c3$0$20842$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3d00832e-aaab-4322-b3d2-bbbbbe9ef0ee@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478756ed$0$4437$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <fa4863cc-d511-40ee-949d-acba1dd9ba22@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478c24de$0$12542$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <e8b3af7c-b183-4a3c-b32c-9a962bd0d138@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478fd5e3$0$25392$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <87303ba1-5ad7-47a5-87e5-842267d168b0@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <87303ba1-5ad7-47a5-87e5-842267d168b0@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <f2e6e$47907412$49e5d4e$29163@DIALUPUSA.NET> X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com Organization: UseNetServer.com Lines: 79 X-Trace: f2e6e47907412a13bf8eb29163