Article View: sci.physics
Article #16304Re: Pound Rebka
From: Eric Gisse
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:18
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:18
39 lines
3743 bytes
3743 bytes
On Jan 17, 1:25 pm, "Max Keon" <maxk...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: [snip] > >>>> So what would the CMBR look like now? It would be virtually > >>>> impossible to detect, wouldn't it! > > >> The CMBR began its journey in a VERY redshifted state and has > >> been progressively redshifted along the way by the expansion. > > >> Do you understand now why the CMBR would be almost impossible to > >> detect in a big bang universe ? > > You are a bleeding moron. The CMBR has been detected many times over > > the past 40 years. > > Yes, it has. But what is detected today requires that spectral > line frequencies generated when the CMBR was first transmitted > be exactly what they are when generated in today's environment. > That's hardly likely when the mass of the entire universe was > within, at most, 10000000 * 2 light years of everything. > > Can't you see that? Your argument would be more meaningful if you had a calculation supporting it. Especially if the argument wasn't that we cannot possibly be observing what has been routinely observed. > > >> But if spectral lines were generated on the same principle as > >> i.e. gamma rays from radioactive iron, they would begin their > >> post CMBR journey in a VERY blueshifted state and, through the > >> expansion, would be redshifted back toward how they appear here > >> in the present. > > >> Some X-ray stars are going to confuse the hell out of you. > > >> ----- > > >> Max Keon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<87303ba1-5ad7-47a5-87e5-842267d168b0@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<f406338a-c84f-4ffb-b26f-91cc1ecb7376@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <b07d7181-f8a8-4f52-93dc-d5b7b7420cbc@z26g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <b930fba9-5f1e-4c26-91eb-98187bc04562@e26g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <477e1a68$0$25819$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <30d40ddf-3af0-4765-9287-ca83ba2b25a5@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <478166dc$0$26468$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <34c68db5-b7b4-4d60-9c7e-c0b926b11e20@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <478430c3$0$20842$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3d00832e-aaab-4322-b3d2-bbbbbe9ef0ee@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478756ed$0$4437$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <fa4863cc-d511-40ee-949d-acba1dd9ba22@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478c24de$0$12542$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <e8b3af7c-b183-4a3c-b32c-9a962bd0d138@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478fd5e3$0$25392$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b6602ccd7db217eb X-Google-Thread: 10f545,b6602ccd7db217eb X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,b6602ccd7db217eb X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,78e626584bab1101 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,78e626584bab1101 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid10f545,gid106b5d,gidfa4c1,gidf74ae,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.org.mensa, fr.sci.physique, sci.astro Subject: Re: Pound Rebka Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:18:05 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 40 Message-ID: <87303ba1-5ad7-47a5-87e5-842267d168b0@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com> References: <f406338a-c84f-4ffb-b26f-91cc1ecb7376@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <b07d7181-f8a8-4f52-93dc-d5b7b7420cbc@z26g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <b930fba9-5f1e-4c26-91eb-98187bc04562@e26g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <477e1a68$0$25819$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <30d40ddf-3af0-4765-9287-ca83ba2b25a5@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <478166dc$0$26468$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <34c68db5-b7b4-4d60-9c7e-c0b926b11e20@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <478430c3$0$20842$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3d00832e-aaab-4322-b3d2-bbbbbe9ef0ee@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478756ed$0$4437$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <fa4863cc-d511-40ee-949d-acba1dd9ba22@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478c24de$0$12542$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <e8b3af7c-b183-4a3c-b32c-9a962bd0d138@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478fd5e3$0$25392$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.229.60.138 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1200633486 8531 127.0.0.1 (18 Jan 2008 05:18:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.229.60.138; posting-account=rIfu6QoAAAD5nXG3h9QEE0J3dZn1U45R User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)