🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #16307

Re: Pound Rebka

#16307
From: Eric Gisse
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:49
69 lines
4954 bytes
On Jan 14, 6:13 pm, "Max Keon" <maxk...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fa4863cc-d511-40ee-949d-acba1dd9ba22@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Max Keon wrote:
> >> So what would the CMBR look like now? It would be virtually
> >> impossible to detect, wouldn't it!
> > ...you have got to be shitting me.
>
> Perhaps stepping through these excerpts from my previous post
> may help you understand.
>
> >> Spectral lines are generated on the same principle as the Caesium
> >> driven atomic clock, displaying gravitational redshift,
>
> Meaning that spectral lines generated from the natural harmonics
> of the charge structure of any molecule, slows with increasing
> depth into a gravity well, which is exactly how the Caesium atom
> charge configuration that drives an atomic clock behaves.
>
> >>      so the
> >> early universe would be redshifted enormously. And that would not
> >> be an illusion.
>
> The matter housed in the early universe was much closer together
> than it is today, wasn't it? So spectral lines would have been
> redshifted enormously at the time, wouldn't they?
>
> Even if our perception of time is directly linked to redshift so
> that locally generated spectral lines and clock frequencies are
> always of the same relative proportions, that wouldn't change
> how we currently (today) perceive the universe 13 billion years
> ago when the CMBR was first transmitted. Would it?
>
> >> Now get this part clear in your head. When we look back 13
> >> billion years in time we are looking at an expanded early
> >> universe that was already enormously redshifted at the time.
>
> Atomic clocks have proven beyond doubt that they run slower
> in a gravity well, and the rate of change is equal to the
> frequency change rate of atomic spectral lines. If there was no
> expansion, spectral lines from the CMBR era could not possibly
> start off as they appear today.
>
> >> So what would the CMBR look like now? It would be virtually
> >> impossible to detect, wouldn't it!
>
> The CMBR began its journey in a VERY redshifted state and has
> been progressively redshifted along the way by the expansion.
>
> Do you understand now why the CMBR would be almost impossible to
> detect in a big bang universe ?

You are a bleeding moron. The CMBR has been detected many times over
the past 40 years.

>
> But if spectral lines were generated on the same principle as
> i.e. gamma rays from radioactive iron, they would begin their
> post CMBR journey in a VERY blueshifted state and, through the
> expansion, would be redshifted back toward how they appear here
> in the present.
>
> Some X-ray stars are going to confuse the hell out of you.
>
> -----
>
> Max Keon
Technical Details
Message-ID: <e8b3af7c-b183-4a3c-b32c-9a962bd0d138@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <f406338a-c84f-4ffb-b26f-91cc1ecb7376@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <b07d7181-f8a8-4f52-93dc-d5b7b7420cbc@z26g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <b930fba9-5f1e-4c26-91eb-98187bc04562@e26g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <477e1a68$0$25819$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <30d40ddf-3af0-4765-9287-ca83ba2b25a5@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <478166dc$0$26468$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <34c68db5-b7b4-4d60-9c7e-c0b926b11e20@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <478430c3$0$20842$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3d00832e-aaab-4322-b3d2-bbbbbe9ef0ee@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478756ed$0$4437$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <fa4863cc-d511-40ee-949d-acba1dd9ba22@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <478c24de$0$12542$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b6602ccd7db217eb
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,b6602ccd7db217eb
X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,b6602ccd7db217eb
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,78e626584bab1101
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,78e626584bab1101
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid10f545,gid106b5d,gidfa4c1,gidf74ae,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.org.mensa, 
 fr.sci.physique, sci.astro
Subject: Re: Pound Rebka
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <e8b3af7c-b183-4a3c-b32c-9a962bd0d138@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <f406338a-c84f-4ffb-b26f-91cc1ecb7376@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> 
 <b07d7181-f8a8-4f52-93dc-d5b7b7420cbc@z26g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
 <b930fba9-5f1e-4c26-91eb-98187bc04562@e26g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <477e1a68$0$25819$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <30d40ddf-3af0-4765-9287-ca83ba2b25a5@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <478166dc$0$26468$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <34c68db5-b7b4-4d60-9c7e-c0b926b11e20@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <478430c3$0$20842$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3d00832e-aaab-4322-b3d2-bbbbbe9ef0ee@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <478756ed$0$4437$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <fa4863cc-d511-40ee-949d-acba1dd9ba22@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <478c24de$0$12542$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.229.60.138
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1200372590 28287 127.0.0.1 (15 Jan 2008 04:49:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:49:50 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.229.60.138; 
 posting-account=rIfu6QoAAAD5nXG3h9QEE0J3dZn1U45R
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) 
 Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)