Article View: sci.physics
Article #16804Re: The Existence of God, or of A god.
From: longshotjohn7
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:54
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:54
153 lines
8867 bytes
8867 bytes
It was said>>>>Presto! Bimbo! when the wash is done one of the socks has completely vanished into the aether Well, truth be known--it fell in the black hole. longshotjohn7 h.g "S D Rodrian" <sdr@sdrodrian.com> wrote in message news:bf7b874e.0111220423.c0f4550@posting.google.com... > "Everett Hickey" <lithium@ev1.net> wrote in message > news:<3bfbe225_2@newsa.ev1.net>... > > > I think you misunderstand what "deterministic" means. > > Oxford Dictionary: > > determinism / n. Philos. > the doctrine that all events, including human action, are determined > by causes regarded as external to the will. > determinist n. > deterministic / adj. > > Merriam-Webster: > > 1 a : a theory or doctrine that acts of the will, > occurrences in nature, or social or psychological > phenomena are causally determined by preceding events > or natural laws > > It's always best to let the dictionary settle these sort > of disputes (they, dictionaries, are "almost" universally used): > > > It has nothing to do with a lack of causality. > > A lot of dictionaries disagree with you. You could try > taking it up with them. In your case, I'd recommend > you hire F. Lee Bailey (now that he'd been disbarred). > > > A non-deterministic universe > > simply means that while your day to day life > > might seem simple enough, you > > simply can't predict what happens over time. > > Sir, my life seems extraordinarily complex and baffling > as it is: I place one perfectly matched pair of socks into > my washer, and... Presto! Bimbo! when the wash is done > one of the socks has completely vanished into the aether! > I open a newspaper and read of Taliban Muslims trying > to work Voodoo on the United States via some sort of > monstrous, murder-working super-genie they called "Allah." > I order a pizza with mushrooms and get one with olives. > Hell, I drink a whole glass topped-over with coffee and > drop off immediately as if it'd been a Mickey! Figure that! > Well, okay, maybe the rum in the coffee has some'm to do > with it. > > > Either that or you're practicing up on sophist philosophy. > > At my age, Sir, by now I'd better be damn good at it. > > SDR > > > -- > > "S D Rodrian" <sdr@sdrodrian.com> wrote in message > > news:bf7b874e.0111201803.84c1e88@posting.google.com... > > > FDA <armingaud@noos.fr> wrote in message > > news:<3BFA94DE.F764559D@noos.fr>... > > > > SDR a οΏ½crit : > > > > > > > > > Yes it is! EVERYTHING in a "deterministic universe" > > > > > has been DETERMINED from its beginning, and its beginnings > > > > > PRE-determine() its EVERYTHING. Simple as that. > > > > > > > > Simple as a definition, in fact, because this is just the definition of > > > > what can be called a deterministic universe. However, this does not > > > > answer the question "do we live in such a universe ?". > > > > > > If "you" didn't it wouldn't be possible for "you" to go from > > > wherever the Hell you're coming from... to your conclusion > > > however inane! [But, hey: Have fun! No ties can bind to reality > > > those who are determined to disconnect with reality.] > > > > > > In fact, such a non sequitur universe could NEVER go ANYWHERE > > > for the simple reason that "going" needs travel a deterministic > > > path "from here to there" (or, no progress, just a jumping > > > here & there, helter skelter all about, back & forth... with > > > no possibility of there ever being a record of its course, of > > > course): Indeterminism = non sequitur > > > > > > > Quantic indetermination suggests that no. > > > > > > But sanity demands that yes: The assumption of indeterminism > > > under ANY and ALL guises excludes sanity itself in the absolute: > > > > > > To repeat myself (which I love to do)... There "are" indeed many > > > "experiments" which "suggest" uncaused effects. The problem with > > > ALL these "experiments" is that the "experimenters" NEVER quite > > > can know HOW unpredictability was produced! [Do you see the problem: > > > IF they know HOW it was produced... that, by definition, would > > > remove any notion that there was any "change" at all involved with > > > their work!] Therefore the assumption of indeterminism MUST forever > > > remain a mere assumption, or it itself becomes the proof positive > > > of determinism! > > > > > > Ignorance always makes the indeterminism claimants propose a "little > > > kingdom" where indeterminism rules... invisible and impossible to test > > > (and prove, of course). Quantum mechanics is probability theory, NOT > > > the vindication of indeterminism you believe it to be (the sucesses > > > of quantum theory's predictions come from sound preparation coupled > > > with relentless work, or... a reduction of the "chance component" down > > > to its barest minimum). You need to realize that quantum theory is a > > > method for producing knowledge (reducing the haystack to the point). [sic] > > > Increasing ignorance (increasing the "chance component") NEVER makes > > > quantum mechanics work better! What more is there to say about this?! > > > > > > And so I stand by my old mantra: KNOWLEDGE ALWAYS PROVES DETERMINISM > > > ... ALWAYS! [This means that "they" will always assume indeterminism > > > from imperfect knowledge... or, as it's more commonly called in the > > > vernacular: IGNORANCE.] > > > > > > ALWAYS USE YOUR BRAIN. Or, if you know your limitations: > > > ALWAYS USE THE BRAINS OF SOMEBODY WHO'S GOT SOME. > > > > > > > Except of course if we accept > > > > Everett's theory that all possible futures do occur whenever any > > > > question is asked about the universe. In such a case, what is determined > > > > is the set of all possible outcomes of a given event. What does not seem > > > > to be determined in which branch of it "we" (whatever that may mean) > > > > will be present after the event. You will certainly agree that it does > > > > not change much of the problem. > > > > > > I highly recommend that you devote your time to reading Dr. Seuss > > > (The Cat In The Hat: You'll love it. And it won't mess up your mind > > > any more than it's already been messed up by the reading you've been > > > doing up to now. Who knows, maybe it'll even allow you to clear away > > > the cobwebs and come up with a clear, concrete thought one day.) > > > > > > Good luck, sincerely, > > > > > > S D Rodrian > > > poems.sdrodrian.com > > > physics.sdrodrian.com >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<XOHN7.21548$ox2.1494935@bin4.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!sfo2-feed1.news.digex.net!ord2-feed1.news.digex.net!intermedia!nntp2.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!bin4.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<9pgnt7$ra$1@geneva.rutgers.edu> <58087ec7.0110171840.22eca189@posting.google.com> <JJJA7.201$cj7.14234@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com> <7783c078.0110220022.13f362f6@posting.google.com> <3bd406ff.3539645@news.mindspring.com> <58087ec7.0110221826.4f4ea265@posting.google.com> <JtjK7.118625$WW.7426738@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <58087ec7.0111200850.5c4a1fa4@posting.google.com> <3BFA94DE.F764559D@noos.fr> <bf7b874e.0111201803.84c1e88@posting.google.com> <3bfbe225_2@newsa.ev1.net> <bf7b874e.0111220423.c0f4550@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 10f2fd,a56c68deea144dae X-Google-Attributes: gid10f2fd,public X-Google-Thread: fdc67,a56c68deea144dae X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc67,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dbf899c9ab551fcf X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: f871d,a56c68deea144dae X-Google-Attributes: gidf871d,public X-Google-Thread: f442a,a56c68deea144dae X-Google-Attributes: gidf442a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-30 00:54:32 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!sfo2-feed1.news.digex.net!ord2-feed1.news.digex.net!intermedia!nntp2.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!bin4.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "longshotjohn7" <fourjays@casuallies.internetpro.netwon.> Newsgroups: sci.physics,gac.physics.astronomy,alt.sci.physics,alt.chaos,alt.astronomy References: <9pgnt7$ra$1@geneva.rutgers.edu> <58087ec7.0110171840.22eca189@posting.google.com> <JJJA7.201$cj7.14234@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com> <7783c078.0110220022.13f362f6@posting.google.com> <3bd406ff.3539645@news.mindspring.com> <58087ec7.0110221826.4f4ea265@posting.google.com> <JtjK7.118625$WW.7426738@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <58087ec7.0111200850.5c4a1fa4@posting.google.com> <3BFA94DE.F764559D@noos.fr> <bf7b874e.0111201803.84c1e88@posting.google.com> <3bfbe225_2@newsa.ev1.net> <bf7b874e.0111220423.c0f4550@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: The Existence of God, or of A god. Lines: 155 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <XOHN7.21548$ox2.1494935@bin4.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 02:54:15 CST Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing X-Trace: sv3-Ry1QFMA/vYvilcypRMaP4mAEQAAwPvodSgZc4tv8Rdq8BuTsJL3beUcmWPzCAikcb4HPhb45NuechWD!nRNg+t06xiMh5iw+uYFkwClQ2Xmnie1PrGGkZSTnYGnqtATtvNfN5LdGGGPf4XB8UDX7FZdOpzdk!FukexSUgQcX6YeWtogzDrt623w== X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:54:15 GMT