Article View: sci.physics
Article #4017Re: heavy doubly magic nuclei
From: SCOTT I CHASE
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 19:46
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 19:46
51 lines
3166 bytes
3166 bytes
In article <Bx8CGq.HsK@news.iastate.edu>, fils@iastate.edu (Douglas R Fils) writes... >sci.physics > While reviewing my 300 level quantum bokk I came upon a >section that hadn't impressed me as much as it does now. It's >in reference to possibility of doubly magic nuclei at Z=114 >and N=184 (Shell model) or perhaps more accurately, Z=110 >and N=184 (Collective model prediction) with decay on the order >of 10^8 years via alpha or spontaneoius fission. > > Has anyone got any good references or heard anything about >this subject? Funny, I was just telling this story to my new officemate. As you correctly point out, there are supposed to be two islands of stability in the (Z,A) plane which would allow the existence of "superheavy" nuclei. Their discovery would be (a) a tremendous boost to the nuclear model builders and (b) a great playground for studying nuclear properties under extreme conditions. The basic way you look for these guys is to collide very heavy nuclei together at low energy - just enough to overcome the mutual coulomb repulsion - to make them "kiss." Some of them should fuse to form the superheavy nucleus you want to study. The superheavy will be in an excited, unstable state, and you should be able to detect its presence from the new unique set of spectral lines or decay fragements that you capture in your detector as it de-excites. People have mounted many experimental searches with no success. The current belief is that it is an experimental problem. The islands of stability are very shallow - the nuclei are bound, but only with very little net binding energy, making their production a tricky process. People are still working on the problem, albeit not with the zeal that the field once had. There is at least one guy here at LBL we has recently worked on refined mass calculations for superheavies, and there still is experimental interest as well. New facilities are probably required, with high intensity heavy ions at low energy. There are no such facilities on the drawing board, at least that I know of in this country. Europe has been doing somewhat better at supporting such work, Germany in particular. Any nuclear physics book will discuss this topic. Segre's book is a good place to start. For modern history, you will have to look for conference proceedings and that kind of thing. -Scott -------------------- Scott I. Chase "It is not a simple life to be a single cell, SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV although I have no right to say so, having been a single cell so long ago myself that I have no memory at all of that stage of my life." - Lewis Thomas
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5NOV199211461983@csa2.lbl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa2.lbl.gov!sichaseReferences:
<Bx8CGq.HsK@news.iastate.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa2.lbl.gov!sichase From: sichase@csa2.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: heavy doubly magic nuclei Date: 5 Nov 1992 11:46 PST Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA Lines: 51 Distribution: world Message-ID: <5NOV199211461983@csa2.lbl.gov> References: <Bx8CGq.HsK@news.iastate.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.197 News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41