Article View: sci.physics
Article #4061Re: Simple observation about Quantum Kitty Cats
From: John C. Baez
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 18:28
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 18:28
33 lines
2610 bytes
2610 bytes
In article <717712154.5@mailbox.bison.mb> Jim.Giles@mailbox.bison.mb.ca (Jim Giles) writes: >Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory > >In article <1992Sep24.190216.13493@riacs.edu>, danforth@riacs.edu (Douglas G. Danforth) writes: >|> [...] >|> If by hypothesizing a new structure that subsumes two other descriptive >|> models then the new structure gains significance via its generality >|> and reduction in parts. The possibility of a unified field that >|> corresponds with QM and GR leads one to look for such an explanation. > >Only if that new hypothesis has *testable* consequences. If not, it's >an exercise in mysticism. Now, don't get me wrong - have nothing against >mysticism. Imagination and wishful thinking may *lead* to testable >ideas. I just oppose mysticism being promoted as known fact. Of course, mathematics has been a branch of mysticism ever since the Pythagoreans (if not earlier). As a mathematician, if one could find a mathematical model from which quantum mechanics and general relativity both "fell out" in some natural manner, it would count as an outstanding achievement even if it had no testable consequences. Elegance, generality and "reduction in parts" are very important in mathematics and also physics to the extent that it is mathematical! This is indeed the mystical side of physics, relying as it does on the faith that "mathematics is the language of nature" (to paraphrase Galileo) which yields the "unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics" (to quote Wigner). However, this mystical faith is time-tested and proven; one need only study how Kepler arrived at his 3 laws, or how Einstein arrived at general relativity, to see that the pursuit of mathematical beauty, in conjunction with painstaking attention to the empirical clues provided by nature, can lead to theories that *later* turn out to have empirical consequences. One should not be in too much of a rush to demand testable consequences; mathematics that is both rigorous and elegant has a strong tendenccy to come in handy eventually.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep29.182835.26555@galois.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!chx400!zeus.ieee.org!rutgers!gatech!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaezReferences:
<717712154.5@mailbox.bison.mb>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!chx400!zeus.ieee.org!rutgers!gatech!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Simple observation about Quantum Kitty Cats Message-ID: <1992Sep29.182835.26555@galois.mit.edu> Date: 29 Sep 92 18:28:35 GMT References: <717712154.5@mailbox.bison.mb> Sender: news@galois.mit.edu Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA Lines: 33 Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz