Article View: sci.physics
Article #4239Re: Simple observation about Quantum Kitty Cats
From: Douglas G. Danforth
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 19:02
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 19:02
16 lines
1243 bytes
1243 bytes
In <22590@galaxy.ucr.edu> baez@ucrmath.ucr.edu (john baez) writes: >In mathematically oriented work it is useful to mix up the model >with reality some of the time, to get "into" the model. It should >be a kind of voluntary suspension of belief, like watching a >good movie or (perhaps a better analogy) playing a good video game. Yes, this helps greatly in the creative process. Several recognized scholars have said they pretend to "be" the thing they are investigating (e.g. like a cancer cell). However, I strongly assert that this is NOT the correct approach for teaching. One must ALWAYS qualify that a theory is just the best current working model. An example of misused (in my opinion) is the word "law" when associated with Newton. It comes squeekingly close to saying our theories are the way the world is.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep30.190240.1432@riacs.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!ames!riacs!danforthReferences:
<717712154.5@mailbox.bison.mb>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!ames!riacs!danforth From: danforth@riacs.edu (Douglas G. Danforth) Subject: Re: Simple observation about Quantum Kitty Cats Message-ID: <1992Sep30.190240.1432@riacs.edu> Sender: news@riacs.edu Organization: RIACS, NASA Ames Research Center References: <717712154.5@mailbox.bison.mb> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 19:02:40 GMT Lines: 16