Article View: sci.physics
Article #4238Re: Simple observation about Quantum Kitty Cats
From: Douglas G. Danforth
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 18:48
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 18:48
12 lines
919 bytes
919 bytes
In <1992Sep30.171247.784@newshost.lanl.gov> jlg@cochiti.lanl.gov (Jim Giles) writes: >Since no *action* at a distance is predicted by QM, there is no >problem. Only *correlation* at a distance is predicted. Such >correlation is quite commonplace in non-QM contexts using hidden >variables. The QM difference is that hidden variables have been >shown *not* to be involved. Detector efficiency is still a loophole that needs to be closed before hidden variables can be ruled out.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep30.184855.1294@riacs.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!riacs!danforthReferences:
<1992Sep28.134825.29472@oracorp.com> <297@mtnmath.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!riacs!danforth From: danforth@riacs.edu (Douglas G. Danforth) Subject: Re: Simple observation about Quantum Kitty Cats Message-ID: <1992Sep30.184855.1294@riacs.edu> Sender: news@riacs.edu Organization: RIACS, NASA Ames Research Center References: <1992Sep28.134825.29472@oracorp.com> <297@mtnmath.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 18:48:55 GMT Lines: 13