🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <abian.718034226@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu> abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) writes:
>   My statements concerning PUTTING VENUS IN AN ORBIT SIMILAR TO THE ORBIT
>OF THE EARTH and TIME HAS INERTIA need no further elucidation, justifi-
>cation or proof.  They are explicit, self-explanatory and self-evident.
>They are true and they are the way of the future.  I do not necessarily
>need the approbation of the so-called guardians of "truth" and "reality".

     If they are self-evident, then one shouldn't even need to post
     them, much less explain them.

     As far as approbation goes, some evidence would be a start.  You don't
     get approbation for physics from us, you get it from nature.

>   People will alter the orbit of Venus and the orbits of other planets
>(Terraforming is not a radical enough solution).  People will alter the
>Tilt of the Earth to avert the persistent occurrences of meteorological
>catastrophes, disasters and calamities.

     Don't you think, just one teensy-weensy bit, that moving the
     axis of the earth around (assuming for grins we could or would
     want to) would cause a bit of meteorological distress? 

> 
>   People will conclude that TIME HAS INERTIA and that Principles of
>Conservation of Energy and Consistency of the Speed of Light must be
>rejected.
>
>   People should study my proposals and further develop them.  Their 
>implementation is inevitable.
>                                                 Alexander ABIAN

     I await the burgeoning groundswell.

                               dale bass
-- 
C. R. Bass                                           crb7q@virginia.edu
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia                            (804) 924-7926