Article View: sci.physics
Article #4436Re: Religion & Physics Don't Mix
From: Blair P. Houghton
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 06:09
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 06:09
25 lines
1438 bytes
1438 bytes
In article <1992Nov9.005834.19898@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes: > Which side do you want to take: 'Cooking' or 'Linguistics'? You're blithering every time you iterate this soundly disproved claim that science and religion are utterly orthogonal in their philosophies and methodologies; perhaps you could at least come up with two topics that really are orthogonal, or are you going to claim that religion and physics are the only two which are? It's downright silly, it is. > Religion hardly has an axiomatic basis Horseshit. It begins with the base postulate that a diety exists. There is no religion that lacks this epitome of all axioms. Here you depart from all semblance of reason, and I will not humor your tragic little delusion any more. --Blair "I have laundry to do, or something dignified like that."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1dkvavINNh9r@chnews.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|ichips!hfglobe!chnews!sedona!bhoughtoReferences:
<Nov.6.19.11.46.1992.3783@ruhets.rutgers.edu> <1dk87uINNek2@chnews.intel.com> <1992Nov9.005834.19898@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|ichips!hfglobe!chnews!sedona!bhoughto From: bhoughto@sedona.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Religion & Physics Don't Mix Date: 9 Nov 1992 06:09:35 GMT Organization: Intel Corp., Chandler, Arizona Lines: 25 Message-ID: <1dkvavINNh9r@chnews.intel.com> References: <Nov.6.19.11.46.1992.3783@ruhets.rutgers.edu> <1dk87uINNek2@chnews.intel.com> <1992Nov9.005834.19898@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: alfalfa.intel.com