Article View: sci.physics
Article #4437Two tracks of time
From: zellner
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 06:38
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 06:38
19 lines
1434 bytes
1434 bytes
> > I once went to a talk by someone who had worked on especially accurate > measures of time, and he remarked that it was conceivable that we > could end up at some point in the future with ... two ways of measuring > it which were both reasonably consistent with ordinary timepieces, and both > self-consistent to ... I believe we do have two such measures, Atomic Time measured with lasers and such and Ephemeris Time measured from the motions and positions of solar- system bodies with reference to General Relativity. Atomic time was set up to be as consistent with Ephemeris Time as experiment would allow, but the ultimate agreement of the two scales in the future is really a matter of experiment, right? If they should be found to run on different tracks, that would no doubt be taken to indicate that we need to modify quantum mechanics or general relativity, or both. Ben
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov9.013839.1@stsci.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!caen!destroyer!ncar!noao!stsci!scivax!zellnerReferences:
<6NOV199215292345@csa1.lbl.gov> <1dhv1tINNrnh@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <1992Nov8.174608.24504@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <1dk21rINN5e6@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!caen!destroyer!ncar!noao!stsci!scivax!zellner From: zellner@stsci.edu Subject: Two tracks of time Message-ID: <1992Nov9.013839.1@stsci.edu> Lines: 20 Sender: news@stsci.edu Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute References: <6NOV199215292345@csa1.lbl.gov> <1dhv1tINNrnh@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <1992Nov8.174608.24504@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <1dk21rINN5e6@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> Distribution: na Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 06:38:39 GMT