Article View: sci.physics
Article #4554Probability courses (was Re: Schrodingers Dog)
From: Douglas G. Danforth
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 00:21
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 00:21
28 lines
1640 bytes
1640 bytes
In <1992Sep30.135833.202931@uctvax.uct.ac.za> naturman@uctvax.uct.ac.za writes: >One of the reasons I gave up physics to become a mathematician was that I was >sick and tired of physicists who had no understanding of basic probability >theory but who continually bullshited about QM. This gives me an opportunity to ask the net a question I have long wished to ask: How many of you (with BS, MS, or PhD in physics) were required to take a course in probability theory given by the math or statistics departments in your universities? A course in statistical mechanics does NOT count. Specifically the words "random variable" and "measure space" must have been included. I ask this simply because I had to leave the field of physics before I was exposed to the true beauty of probability theory. Neither Stanford's undergraduate degree program nor the U. of Maryland's graduate program required a course in probability theory. This is truely remarkable since Stanford's statistics department is about 100 feet from the physics building! I'm truely curious. How many of your departments require courses in probability theory? Douglas Danforth
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct5.002102.22858@riacs.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!riacs!danforthReferences:
<1992Sep30.135833.202931@uctvax.uct.ac.za>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!riacs!danforth From: danforth@riacs.edu (Douglas G. Danforth) Subject: Probability courses (was Re: Schrodingers Dog) Message-ID: <1992Oct5.002102.22858@riacs.edu> Keywords: Cats , Quantum Merchanics, Cruelty to Animals Sender: news@riacs.edu Organization: RIACS, NASA Ames Research Center References: <1992Sep30.135833.202931@uctvax.uct.ac.za> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 00:21:02 GMT Lines: 29