🚀 go-pugleaf

firth@sei.cmu.edu (Robert Firth) writes:

>However, as I said, that's a minor point.  Your major point is that the
>act of observing a system, and finding it seemingly unchanged from a
>previous observation, can indeed affect the subsequent behaviour of the
>system.  In other words, a "null observation" has an effect on the
>thing observed.

I was under the impression that, if the fields used to do the null
observations are included in the model, the Zeno effect shows up without
the need to postulate any sort of extra collapse event.  Does anybody know
specifics?
-- 
Matt McIrvin, posting nonsense again