🚀 go-pugleaf

The key idea behind my conception of how the nonlocal quantum connection is
a practical communication channel in standard quantum mechanics in spite of
the bogus matheamtical arguments to the contrary is right here.  Feynman's
"sum over histories" Lagrangian multiple-time formulation may not be
equivalent to the Hamiltonian operator fixed-time formulation of quantum
mechanics. The latter emerges from the former as a special case just like
the Schrodinger fixed-time wave function emerges from the sum of path
amplitudes.  The commutativity of the hermitian observables is necessary
for compatibility (i.e., non-interference) of measurements but not
sufficent in the presence of both "entanglement" and "interfering
alternatives".  It is the last that is essential.  It is correct to say
that if there is commutativity and entanglement but no interference (the
situation in the actual experiments of Clauser, Aspect et-al) then there is
no quantum connection communication.  But, if the interference is
engineered correctly then such communication across spacelike intervals and
backward along timelike and lightlike intervals is possible.  Indeed, the
origin and evolution of the universe depend upon quantum connection
communication.