🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <abian.721770451@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu> abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) writes:
>
>
>   Indra, please go to the nearest University, go to the Physics Department
>find the most "prominent" physicist there and ask him/her:
>
>    " WHY , say, TWO NEGATIVE ELECTRICAL CHARGES  REPEL "
>
>My guess is that his/her answer will be  "It is a principle , we do not ask
>why we use Coulomb's law to quantify the repelling force"
>
>   Indra, my answer is  "According to (A1), the space tends to maintain
>the status quo of its electrical neutrality and opposes a further concentr-
>ation of negative charges, and repels them.  However, if we overpower the 
>space we may crush  spaces' opposition", and a new Status Quo is created.
>   

Indra, the real answer is that this is caused by the electromagnetic
force which has been understood for literally centuries.  This
may sound like mere posturing, (I can even hear Mr. Abian now,
"you don't understand it so you call it electromagnetism"),
but electromagnetism was proved in the 1920s by a man whose
name begins with K that temporarily escapes me to actually be gravity
operating in 5 dimensions.

Let me put that another way.  Gravity (relativistically speaking)
is a distortion of the space-time continuum.  If you extend that
continuum to 5 dimensions, you get electromagnetism, which
causes the two negative charges to repel.  There is no need to
resort to these Status Quos and Provokers and Provokees which
are unclear, undefined, un-backed-up by mathematics, unpredictive,
unscientific, and (I must admit) rapidly becoming more and more
uninteresting.

I'm sorry if the science in this post is muddled. If you like,
I will email you with a better description, or perhaps someone
with more knowledge and better communication skills will oblige
us with a translation.

	Jason (not the Jason that asked for Abian's credentials
		but an incredible simulation)