🚀 go-pugleaf

                                                11-15-92

Dear Mr. Talbot,
  
  In your latest reply to me  you have completely avoided the issue:

whether or not the PRINCIPLE OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY HAS BEEN
EXPERIMENTALLY VERIFIED FOR THE ENTIRE COSMOS !!
  
  You even avoided to say whether or not you believe that NO ENERGY IS 
LOST IRRETRIEVABLY IN THE COSMOS ! (leaving aside giving a proof of your
beliefs!) 
  
  Instead, you have resorted to offensive, obnoxious, execrable, repulsive 
and approbrious language and said:  

"I understand what Abian is trying to say, and I think it's garbage "

Well, I understand you - you are reacting based on envy and jealousy
- otherwise there would be no need of words such as "garbage" by which
you probably also mean beta-sigma.
  
   You are jealous that I am the first, the very first person who
has revolutionized the entire Physics, by stating:

(A2)   TIME HAS INERTIA, i.e., TIME IS MATTER  and that some energy
       is irretrievably spent by Cosmos to move TIME forward. Thus,
       in particular, the Principle of Conservation of Energy must be
       rejected. 


in accordance with:

(A1)   THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO, REACTION TO PRO-
       VOCATION AND THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING AGAIN A STATUS QUO

  With best wishes and regards,
                                         Alexander Abian





-- 
   The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
                The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.  
    TIME HAS INERTIA  and some energy is lost to move Time forward  
  E = mcc  (Einstein)    must be replaced by    E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)