🚀 go-pugleaf

janpajak@gmail.com wrote:
> Although it can shock us enormously, so-called "laws" which according
> to present science supposedly rule energy, are equally absurd like
> warnings of monks from early medieval times about the travelling to
> the edge of world and falling down from a cliff there directly to the
> "hell". After all, these laws were formulated before the science was
> able to earn the knowledge as to what actually this "energy" is. 

Science still does not know. Science never will know. The concept of 
"energy" is simply a term that appears in equations that describe the 
results of measuring the behaviour of physical systems.

> On
> the other hand, without knowing what energy actually is, the science
> had no either logical basis, nor required data, to discover the true
> laws that rule over energy. In turn erroneous assumption of scientists
> that the "laws", which the science formulated much earlier, still are
> supposedly correct, make it impossible for the science to determine
> what really "energy" is, and what laws really rule over this energy.

The law of conservation of energy is named a 'law' rather than a theory 
because it has no theoretical underpinning. It is simply an apparent 
rule that has been observed. Of course, it had to be modified by the 
realisation that the mass and energy terms in theories could be 
interchanged. The law is now known as the law of conservation of 
mass-energy.

> Furthermore, theoretical findings of the "theory of everything" called
> the Concept of Dipolar Gravity (described on the web page
> "dipolar_gravity.htm") prove that these free energy devices truly can
> be build.

A theory cannot prove that. Rather, the construction of a free energy 
device would invalidate theories that indicate that such a device is 
impossible, and tend to support theories that allow their existence.

We're stuck with the inconvenient fact that despite the multiple claims 
for free energy devices, none is yet available for purchase in the shops.

Sylvia.