🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:48:52 +1000, Sylvia Else
<sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:

>janpajak@gmail.com wrote:
>> Although it can shock us enormously, so-called "laws" which according
>> to present science supposedly rule energy, are equally absurd like
>> warnings of monks from early medieval times about the travelling to
>> the edge of world and falling down from a cliff there directly to the
>> "hell". After all, these laws were formulated before the science was
>> able to earn the knowledge as to what actually this "energy" is. 
>
>Science still does not know. Science never will know. The concept of 
>"energy" is simply a term that appears in equations that describe the 
>results of measuring the behaviour of physical systems.
>
>> On
>> the other hand, without knowing what energy actually is, the science
>> had no either logical basis, nor required data, to discover the true
>> laws that rule over energy. In turn erroneous assumption of scientists
>> that the "laws", which the science formulated much earlier, still are
>> supposedly correct, make it impossible for the science to determine
>> what really "energy" is, and what laws really rule over this energy.
>
>The law of conservation of energy is named a 'law' rather than a theory 
>because it has no theoretical underpinning. It is simply an apparent 
>rule that has been observed. Of course, it had to be modified by the 
>realisation that the mass and energy terms in theories could be 
>interchanged. The law is now known as the law of conservation of 
>mass-energy.
>
>> Furthermore, theoretical findings of the "theory of everything" called
>> the Concept of Dipolar Gravity (described on the web page
>> "dipolar_gravity.htm") prove that these free energy devices truly can
>> be build.
>
>A theory cannot prove that. Rather, the construction of a free energy 
>device would invalidate theories that indicate that such a device is 
>impossible, and tend to support theories that allow their existence.
>
>We're stuck with the inconvenient fact that despite the multiple claims 
>for free energy devices, none is yet available for purchase in the shops.
>
>Sylvia.

If free energy devices can be built, then the universe will melt,
unless someone also invents a energy consumption device 
that takes energy and produces nothing.
So far, Ive not seen any claims for such a device.