🚀 go-pugleaf

Surfer wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:33:23 +1100, Oy rool out a carbon tax
> <gillard_lies@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> Surfer wrote:
> 
>>> http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/himalaya-statement-20january2010.pd
>>> "....a paragraph in the 938-page Working Group II contribution to the
>>> underlying assessment2 refers to poorly substantiated estimates of
>>> rate of recession and date for the disappearance of Himalayan
>>> glaciers. In drafting the paragraph in question, the clear and
>>> well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC
>>> procedures, were not applied properly...."
>> Glad you quoted this. It shows what un unscientific body of blunderers
>> the IPCC is. It also shows that they themselves don't understand the
>> significance of quoting a 4-digit date for the disappearance of (even
>> one) glacier implies.
>>
> Rubbish. It was simply a human error that was corrected when the
> document was later reviewed.

You still won't get it will you. The fact that it was quoted like it was
(time frame being right OR wrong) demonstrates the ineptitude of this
organization which masquerades as a scientific body. Their credibility
(very important in the world of science) was revealed for what it is.

>>> One paragraph wrong in a 938-page document doesn't sound like a major
>>> issue.
>> This is only because you don't understand the significance of the error.
>>
> 
> After being corrected it has lost all significance.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Then again, "you can't handle
the truth" by the look of it.

You clearly haven't even *tried* to educate yourself in the scientific
method, as I suggested, have you? Since you're so good at Googling bits
& pieces, do yourself a favour and try "precision accuracy scientific
method". The truth may hurt but it will set you free. Until you can move
up from just quoting Google hits, your arguments will remain insignificant.

-- 
Labor-Green open borders plan in action...

Number of illegal aliens in detention:

Jan 2005 __________
Jul 2005 ________
Jan 2006 _________
Jul 2006 ______
Jan 2007 _____
Jul 2007 ____
Jan 2008 ____
Jul 2008 ___
Jan 2009 ___ Rudd stops TPVs
Jul 2009 __________
Jan 2010 _________________
Jul 2010 ______________________________

Where to next?