🚀 go-pugleaf

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/tree/browse_frm/thread/73ec243f9cbb4d3d/ab0c76b7df087855?hl=en&rnum=1&_done=%2Fgroup%2Ftalk.politics.misc%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F73ec243f9cbb4d3d%3Fhl%3Den%26scoring%3Dd%26&scoring=d#doc_ab0c76b7df087855

On Oct 26, 7:31 am, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 26, 10:52 am, "kdth...@earthlink.net" >
'>
'> Aww look, KD's got all annoyed and started shouting again to try to
'> make himeself heard.
'>
'> x thousands and thousands of scientists. All suffering from a
criminal
'> dysfunctionality of the intellect, while KD undersatands what's
really
'> going on. I think that would probably be certifiable, if you told
the
'> tale to a psychiatrist.-

That's a AWFULLY damn lame arguement, when I have refered
documentation from two of the most important scientists of the 20th
century, who in dealing with the topics of gases and thermodynamics,
make no definition or description of 'greenhouse gases',

In the meantime, us flatearthers and stone age mentality hillbillies
are wondering why with all the billions of dollars spent by Hansen's
devotees and disciples, you can only refer documentation of
spectroscopic properties of CO2, and no laboratory evidence whatsoever
to confirm your interpretation that these dark bands  of the continous
spectrum of the emitted radiation of the gas, indicate INORDINATE
ABSORPTION which would be reflected in the increase of energy of
INCREASED TEMEPERATURE?

SEE ALL THIS DAMN BLANK SPACE,

You sure can dig deep and quickly when it comes to assasinating the
character of your dissent, but NO REFERENCE to direct scientific
documentation of the Tyndell parlor trick upon which ALL your
dysfunctional and fraudulent theoretical science is based?

REFER YOUR GDAMN SCIENCE TO SUPPORT YOUR STATEMENTS

USING THE WORD SCIENCE, IS ALL YOU RETARDS ACTUALLY HAVE, SO WEAR IT
THE FUCK OUT, FREAKY GLOBAL WARMING KOOKS

ONE DOES FEEL LIKE YELLING WHEN DEALING WITH THE AUTISTIC AND DYSLEXIC
CHARLATANS WHO CLAIM SCIENTIFIC CLAIRVOYANCE AS THEIR CLAIM TO
COMPLETE CONTROL OF RECOURCES OF ENERGY

http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1967/1967_Hansen_Matsushima.pdf

Here is an article written by Hansen, who had just recently gained
his
PhD in Physics. He does a full thesis here in which he defines that
the temperatures  of Venus are definitely caused by very small dust
particles. He goes over alternate causes which he discounts.

NOWHERE DOES HANSEN INCORPORATE OR REFERENCE THE PROPERTY OF
GREENHOUSE GASES.

NOW HE IS THE FORERUNNER, IN CLAIMING THAT THE CHANGE IN METHANE OF
EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE OF LESS THAN 1PPM COULD HAVE DEVASTATING EFFECTS
UPON THE CLIMATE.

YET HE FELT NO NEED TO INCORPORATE THE EFFECTS OF ANY GASES UPON THE
TEMPERATURE, ESPECIALLY NOT CO2. IT WAS WELL UNDERSTOOD THAT CO2 MUST
BE A PREDOMINATE GAS IN THE ATMOSPHERE OF VENUS.

A)
EITHER HE IS A PURE CHARLATAN FOR INVENTING THIS THERMODYNAMIC OUTLINE
WHICH CANNOT BE VALID IF GREENHOUSE GASES EXIST


B)
OR HE IS A PURE CHARLATAN FOR HIS LATER WORK OF WHICH HE IS A PIONEER
OF THE EFFECTS OF GREENHOUSE GASES

TAKE YOUR GDAMN PICK.

EITHER WAY HE IS A HIGH CRIMINAL AND TRAITOR TO ALL OF HUMANITY, AND
US FLAT EARTHERS THINK HE SHOULD BE PUSHED OF THE GDAMN EDGE INTO HIS
ETERNAL DESTINY, ALONG WITH ALL THE BLIND FAITHFULL OF HIS HOSTILE AND
DANGEROUS FLOCK.

AT THE VERY DAMN LEAST, THE FACT THAT THIS PAPER EXISTS, MEANS THE
BURDEN OF PROOF IS SQUARELY UPON YOU TO DEMONSTRATE DIRECT SCIENCE TO
SUPPORT THE TENET OF GREENHOUSE GASES.


HERE IS ALSO A BOOK FROM A NOBEL PRIZE LAUREATE OF THE 1950'S. HE DOES
120 PAGES ON GASES, INCORPORATING ALL FUNDAMENTAL KNOWLEDGE ON GASES
AT THAT TIME. NO PROPERTY OF GREENHOUSE GASES IS MENTIONED OR
DESCRIBED.

http://books.google.com/books?id=EpxSzteNvMYC&pg=PA327&lpg=PA327&vq=h...

CO2 IS ONLY FOUND TO BE A NORMAL GAS. WHICH OBEYS THE PERFECT GAS LAW
AT LOW PRESSURES LIKE ALL OTHER NORMAL GASES.

FURTHER PROOF THAT YOU CANNOT RIGHTFULLY CLAIM FOREGONE UNDERSTANDING
OF THIS PROPERTY.

YOU HAVE THE BURDEN OF PROOF.


KD