🚀 go-pugleaf

On Oct 29, 10:46 am, "kdth...@earthlink.net" <kdth...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/tree/browse_frm/thr...
>
> On Oct 26, 7:31 am, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:> On Oct 26, 10:52 am, "kdth...@earthlink.net" >
>
> '>
> '> Aww look, KD's got all annoyed and started shouting again to try to
> '> make himeself heard.
> '>
> '> x thousands and thousands of scientists. All suffering from a
> criminal
> '> dysfunctionality of the intellect, while KD undersatands what's
> really
> '> going on. I think that would probably be certifiable, if you told
> the
> '> tale to a psychiatrist.-
>
> That's a AWFULLY damn lame arguement, when I have refered
> documentation from two of the most important scientists of the 20th
> century, who in dealing with the topics of gases and thermodynamics,
> make no definition or description of 'greenhouse gases',
>
> In the meantime, us flatearthers and stone age mentality hillbillies
> are wondering why with all the billions of dollars spent by Hansen's
> devotees and disciples, you can only refer documentation of
> spectroscopic properties of CO2, and no laboratory evidence whatsoever
> to confirm your interpretation that these dark bands  of the continous
> spectrum of the emitted radiation of the gas, indicate INORDINATE
> ABSORPTION which would be reflected in the increase of energy of
> INCREASED TEMEPERATURE?
>
> SEE ALL THIS DAMN BLANK SPACE,
>
> You sure can dig deep and quickly when it comes to assasinating the
> character of your dissent, but NO REFERENCE to direct scientific
> documentation of the Tyndell parlor trick upon which ALL your
> dysfunctional and fraudulent theoretical science is based?
>
> REFER YOUR GDAMN SCIENCE TO SUPPORT YOUR STATEMENTS
>
> USING THE WORD SCIENCE, IS ALL YOU RETARDS ACTUALLY HAVE, SO WEAR IT
> THE FUCK OUT, FREAKY GLOBAL WARMING KOOKS
>
> ONE DOES FEEL LIKE YELLING WHEN DEALING WITH THE AUTISTIC AND DYSLEXIC
> CHARLATANS WHO CLAIM SCIENTIFIC CLAIRVOYANCE AS THEIR CLAIM TO
> COMPLETE CONTROL OF RECOURCES OF ENERGY
>
> http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1967/1967_Hansen_Matsushima.pdf
>
> Here is an article written by Hansen, who had just recently gained
> his
> PhD in Physics. He does a full thesis here in which he defines that
> the temperatures  of Venus are definitely caused by very small dust
> particles. He goes over alternate causes which he discounts.
>
> NOWHERE DOES HANSEN INCORPORATE OR REFERENCE THE PROPERTY OF
> GREENHOUSE GASES.
>
> NOW HE IS THE FORERUNNER, IN CLAIMING THAT THE CHANGE IN METHANE OF
> EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE OF LESS THAN 1PPM COULD HAVE DEVASTATING EFFECTS
> UPON THE CLIMATE.
>
> YET HE FELT NO NEED TO INCORPORATE THE EFFECTS OF ANY GASES UPON THE
> TEMPERATURE, ESPECIALLY NOT CO2. IT WAS WELL UNDERSTOOD THAT CO2 MUST
> BE A PREDOMINATE GAS IN THE ATMOSPHERE OF VENUS.
>
> A)
> EITHER HE IS A PURE CHARLATAN FOR INVENTING THIS THERMODYNAMIC OUTLINE
> WHICH CANNOT BE VALID IF GREENHOUSE GASES EXIST
>
> B)
> OR HE IS A PURE CHARLATAN FOR HIS LATER WORK OF WHICH HE IS A PIONEER
> OF THE EFFECTS OF GREENHOUSE GASES
>
> TAKE YOUR GDAMN PICK.
>
> EITHER WAY HE IS A HIGH CRIMINAL AND TRAITOR TO ALL OF HUMANITY, AND
> US FLAT EARTHERS THINK HE SHOULD BE PUSHED OF THE GDAMN EDGE INTO HIS
> ETERNAL DESTINY, ALONG WITH ALL THE BLIND FAITHFULL OF HIS HOSTILE AND
> DANGEROUS FLOCK.
>
> AT THE VERY DAMN LEAST, THE FACT THAT THIS PAPER EXISTS, MEANS THE
> BURDEN OF PROOF IS SQUARELY UPON YOU TO DEMONSTRATE DIRECT SCIENCE TO
> SUPPORT THE TENET OF GREENHOUSE GASES.
>
> HERE IS ALSO A BOOK FROM A NOBEL PRIZE LAUREATE OF THE 1950'S. HE DOES
> 120 PAGES ON GASES, INCORPORATING ALL FUNDAMENTAL KNOWLEDGE ON GASES
> AT THAT TIME. NO PROPERTY OF GREENHOUSE GASES IS MENTIONED OR
> DESCRIBED.
>
> http://books.google.com/books?id=EpxSzteNvMYC&pg=PA327&lpg=PA327&vq=h...
>
> CO2 IS ONLY FOUND TO BE A NORMAL GAS. WHICH OBEYS THE PERFECT GAS LAW
> AT LOW PRESSURES LIKE ALL OTHER NORMAL GASES.
>
> FURTHER PROOF THAT YOU CANNOT RIGHTFULLY CLAIM FOREGONE UNDERSTANDING
> OF THIS PROPERTY.
>
> YOU HAVE THE BURDEN OF PROOF.
>
> KD

My "Heavy Air Theory" is proven by 17 tornadoes in one day taken place
Wenesday. Its a simple theory,and goes with weight + speed =force
TreBert