🚀 go-pugleaf

Luha wrote:
> 
snip

> > > I decided to go to your website
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > Good thinking.
> >
> Not really.  I didn't find anything resembling thinking at your website.
> 
> >  to see how wrong you could be.  The first
> > > thing I noticed is your rather unusual definition for "god".
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > Ooops.. another idiot.  i have no "definition" of God.
> >
> Exactly.  You have claimed to have proven something you have not defined.
> Any idiot can do that.  And now one has.

[Hammond]
Wrong idiot.  You can't "define" something before you discover it.
discovery involves discovering something that was previously
unknown.  If then, it turns out to be something that was already
suspected, then fine, that proves you were right even more.
for instance, Anderson discovered a positive charged electron.
Then they pointed out it could be Dirac's negative energy states.
Turned out it was.
  Same thing for me. I discovered that Psychometry ends axiomatically
in a single factor.  I said it must be the most powerful psychological
quantity known to history.  Somebody said "it's probably God",
turns out they were right.  End of story.
  No where did I propose, nor have I ever proposed, a
"definition" of God.  i simply discovered the EXPLANATION of
God, just like Dirac discovered the EXPLANATION of the Positron.
 Whaddu think I'm stupid?




> >
> >
> >   Your god seems
> > > to be technology, not the ubiquitous, omnipotent creator.  That's OK.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > Wrong again, naturally.
> >
> I took my best stab at what you were attempting to prove.  I was wrong.
> Sorry.  You really have proven nothing.  You should be sorry as well.
> >
> > >
> > > However, your postulate is flawed in that it does not pass the cause and
> > > effect premise.  You state that a brain will comprehend more based on
> size
> > > and weight.  This makes you a phrenologist.

[Hammond]
Don't call me any of your family names.



> >
> > [Hammond]
> > Naturally you don't have any formal education
> > or anything, do you?
> >
> I know enough to question my hypotheses for causality/result relationships.
> Guess you skipped this class.

[Hammond]
You got that one right.


snip

> > [Hammond]
> > Don't worry about it... it won't have any affect on
> > your feeble mind.... it's all over your head.
> >
> Oh, but you're wrong.  I didn't realize how good my thinking was until I
> read your prattle.  When is your brain going to grow to compete with the
> other posters on the usenet?  Does this mean we are your god?


[Hammond]
Why is it that uneducated morons and educated geniuses
are the only people who believe there is a God?  What do
these people have in common?  Is this some kind of divine
justice or something?

-- 
BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW:
-----------------------------------------------------------
George Hammond, M.S. Physics
Email:    ghammond@mediaone.net
Website:  http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html
-----------------------------------------------------------