🚀 go-pugleaf

"George Hammond" <ghammond@mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3AECB1F1.7DC0EB3A@mediaone.net...
> Luha wrote:
> >
> snip
>
> > > > I decided to go to your website
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > Good thinking.
> > >
> > Not really.  I didn't find anything resembling thinking at your website.
> >
> > >  to see how wrong you could be.  The first
> > > > thing I noticed is your rather unusual definition for "god".
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > Ooops.. another idiot.  i have no "definition" of God.
> > >
> > Exactly.  You have claimed to have proven something you have not
defined.
> > Any idiot can do that.  And now one has.
>
> [Hammond]
> Wrong idiot.

Nah, you're the right idiot.  Unless that wasn't your website or you forgot
the comma.

  You can't "define" something before you discover it.

True enough but you sure can give a true discovery a new name.  Using the
worn-out label of "god" is a little disingenuous.  Did you use it because it
got you attention?  If so, you're nothing but a whore.

> discovery involves discovering something that was previously
> unknown.  If then, it turns out to be something that was already
> suspected, then fine, that proves you were right even more.

So God was suspected?  As god has never been fully defined, you had quite a
large margin of error.

> for instance, Anderson discovered a positive charged electron.
> Then they pointed out it could be Dirac's negative energy states.
> Turned out it was.
>   Same thing for me. I discovered that Psychometry ends axiomatically
> in a single factor.  I said it must be the most powerful psychological
> quantity known to history.

Not one for overstatement, are you?  My world didn't change at all so you
must have been wrong about it.

  Somebody said "it's probably God",
> turns out they were right.

Was that before of after you were tossed out of the bar?

  End of story.

Excellent.  You're not posting again?  Wow, maybe there is a god after all!

>   No where did I propose, nor have I ever proposed, a
> "definition" of God.  i simply discovered the EXPLANATION of
> God, just like Dirac discovered the EXPLANATION of the Positron.
>  Whaddu think I'm stupid?
>
Guilty.
>
>
>
> > >
> > >
> > >   Your god seems
> > > > to be technology, not the ubiquitous, omnipotent creator.  That's
OK.
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > Wrong again, naturally.
> > >
> > I took my best stab at what you were attempting to prove.  I was wrong.
> > Sorry.  You really have proven nothing.  You should be sorry as well.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > However, your postulate is flawed in that it does not pass the cause
and
> > > > effect premise.  You state that a brain will comprehend more based
on
> > size
> > > > and weight.  This makes you a phrenologist.
>
> [Hammond]
> Don't call me any of your family names.
>
How long did it take you to think up this comeback, genius?  Nyah-Nyah would
have been just as good.
>
>
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > Naturally you don't have any formal education
> > > or anything, do you?
> > >
> > I know enough to question my hypotheses for causality/result
relationships.
> > Guess you skipped this class.
>
> [Hammond]
> You got that one right.
>
If you can't prove causality, your hypotheses are just guesswork.  Or, as
you would phrase it, iterative stochastic approximation.  Why is it that
it's the jerks in science that like the big fancy words?
>
> snip
>
> > > [Hammond]
> > > Don't worry about it... it won't have any affect on
> > > your feeble mind.... it's all over your head.
> > >
> > Oh, but you're wrong.  I didn't realize how good my thinking was until I
> > read your prattle.  When is your brain going to grow to compete with the
> > other posters on the usenet?  Does this mean we are your god?
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Why is it that uneducated morons and educated geniuses
> are the only people who believe there is a God?

Dunno, hammie.  Why?  Do you think I believe in god?  I guess you're not
tired of being wrong yet.  BTW, idiot, you claimed to have prooved god.
Can't have it both ways.


  What do
> these people have in common?  Is this some kind of divine
> justice or something?
>
Nah.  Must have a transition state between you and the sane.  That's all.

> --
> BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW:
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> George Hammond, M.S. Physics
> Email:    ghammond@mediaone.net
> Website:  http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------