🚀 go-pugleaf

On 3 May 1997 02:33:24 GMT, jgardner@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (John Gardner)
wrote:

>wf3h@enter.net wrote:

>: thats what happens with competition and the diversity of
>: environments...no designer needed.
>
>assuming evolution and not weighing evidence.

uh, prove it. science IS evolution and NO designer. unless you have
some reason for including magic...
>
>
>: why? from a scientific viewpoint this is unnecessary. evolution
>: provides a completely adequate view of how life evolves.
>
>assuming evolution and disregarding evidence.

you mean like the bible? sorry, the bible doesnt count. it isnt a
science book. you offer little outside of propaganda designed to
support your religious views.

>
>don't need to prove the Bible, just trying to see if evolution
>indeed fits the facts.
>
>
]the nice thing is, it does. the wonderful experiment with lizards in
the bahamas was an elegant demonstration of evolution in action. 

and 'proving' the bible is a meaningless statement. millions of xtians
have no problem with evolution and the bible. its only a small group
of political ideologue who feel that the bible is to xtianity what
marx was to communism that are threatened by science.






delete the xx from my email address to reply