🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 12, 4:55 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
> "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > On Jan 12, 10:40 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jan 12, 8:13 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 11, 2:58 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jan 8, 9:03 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Indeed!  And how does a particle not have mass?
>
> > > > > > > > > If its not really a particle in the classical physics sense.
>
> > > > > > > > Explain how a non-classical massless particle exists in nothing.
>
> > > > > > > What particle? Light is an electromagnetic wave. The idea that its a
> > > > > > > particles is a simplification used to explain its quantum nature.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Paul Hovnanian     mailto:P...@Hovnanian.com
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > If your only tool is a hammer then every problem looks like a thumb.
>
> > > > > > Wikipedia:
>
> > > > > > "A massless particle is a particle whose invariant mass is zero.
> > > > > > Currently, the only known massless particles are gauge bosons: the
> > > > > > photon (carrier of electromagnetism) and the gluon (carrier of the
> > > > > > strong force)."
>
> > > > > > "The behavior of massless particles is understood by virtue of special
> > > > > > relativity. For example, these particles must always move at the speed
> > > > > > of light. See Mass in special relativity."
>
> > > > > > "General relativity implies that gravitation is quantized by the
> > > > > > graviton, which is a massless tensor boson"
>
> > > > > > How does an electromagnetic wave travel through nothing?
>
> > > > > I'm afraid you will have to go back and study the basics. Start with
> > > > > static electric and magnetic fields. They produce a force that has an
> > > > > effect over a distance with no intervening medium.
>
> > > Show me the experimental evidence where it is proven there is no
> > > medium.
>
> > > Why have the probability of a wave when you can have an actual wave in
> > > the aether?
>
> > And don't reply with the MM Experiment.
>
> > The MM Experiment looked for the aether wind.
>
> No, it did not. It looked for the motion of the earth through the
> aether.
>

At least have the courtesy of reading Wikipedia before posting:

"Since the Earth is in motion, it was expected that the flow of aether
across the Earth should produce a detectable "aether wind"."

> > Aether displacement is the opposite of the concept of an aether wind.
>
> > The fact that the MM Experiment did not find and aether wind is
> > evidence of aether displacement, not that there is no aether.
>
> No. The MM experiment failed to find aether moving relative to the earth
> due to the earth's motion. There is no aether to displace.
>

The fact that there was no "aether wind' detected is evidence of
aether displacement.