🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 12, 3:55 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
> "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > On Jan 12, 10:40 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jan 12, 8:13 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 11, 2:58 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jan 8, 9:03 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Indeed!  And how does a particle not have mass?
>
> > > > > > > > > If its not really a particle in the classical physics sense.
>
> > > > > > > > Explain how a non-classical massless particle exists in nothing.
>
> > > > > > > What particle? Light is an electromagnetic wave. The idea that its a
> > > > > > > particles is a simplification used to explain its quantum nature.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Paul Hovnanian     mailto:P...@Hovnanian.com
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > If your only tool is a hammer then every problem looks like a thumb.
>
> > > > > > Wikipedia:
>
> > > > > > "A massless particle is a particle whose invariant mass is zero.
> > > > > > Currently, the only known massless particles are gauge bosons: the
> > > > > > photon (carrier of electromagnetism) and the gluon (carrier of the
> > > > > > strong force)."
>
> > > > > > "The behavior of massless particles is understood by virtue of special
> > > > > > relativity. For example, these particles must always move at the speed
> > > > > > of light. See Mass in special relativity."
>
> > > > > > "General relativity implies that gravitation is quantized by the
> > > > > > graviton, which is a massless tensor boson"
>
> > > > > > How does an electromagnetic wave travel through nothing?
>
> > > > > I'm afraid you will have to go back and study the basics. Start with
> > > > > static electric and magnetic fields. They produce a force that has an
> > > > > effect over a distance with no intervening medium.
>
> > > Show me the experimental evidence where it is proven there is no
> > > medium.
>
> > > Why have the probability of a wave when you can have an actual wave in
> > > the aether?
>
> > And don't reply with the MM Experiment.
>
> > The MM Experiment looked for the aether wind.
>
> No, it did not. It looked for the motion of the earth through the
> aether.
>
> > Aether displacement is the opposite of the concept of an aether wind.
>
> > The fact that the MM Experiment did not find and aether wind is
> > evidence of aether displacement, not that there is no aether.
>
> No. The MM experiment failed to find aether moving relative to the earth
> due to the earth's motion. There is no aether to displace.
>

It assigned properties to the aether (interaction with a moving body
of matter)
and then tested on the basis of these properties
when it knew nothing about the aether in the first place.

How stupid are these people?

They haven't ruled out the aether.
All they've ruled out is the effect they decided to search for.




john