๐Ÿš€ go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #9116

Re: Aether Displacement

#9116
From: mpc755
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:24
123 lines
6416 bytes
On Jan 12, 4:46ย pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
> "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > On Jan 12, 8:13 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jan 11, 2:58 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jan 8, 9:03 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
> > > > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Indeed! ย And how does a particle not have mass?
>
> > > > > > > > If its not really a particle in the classical physics sense.
>
> > > > > > > Explain how a non-classical massless particle exists in nothing.
>
> > > > > > What particle? Light is an electromagnetic wave. The idea that its a
> > > > > > particles is a simplification used to explain its quantum nature.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Paul Hovnanian ย  ย  mailto:P...@Hovnanian.com
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > If your only tool is a hammer then every problem looks like a thumb.
>
> > > > > Wikipedia:
>
> > > > > "A massless particle is a particle whose invariant mass is zero.
> > > > > Currently, the only known massless particles are gauge bosons: the
> > > > > photon (carrier of electromagnetism) and the gluon (carrier of the
> > > > > strong force)."
>
> > > > > "The behavior of massless particles is understood by virtue of special
> > > > > relativity. For example, these particles must always move at the speed
> > > > > of light. See Mass in special relativity."
>
> > > > > "General relativity implies that gravitation is quantized by the
> > > > > graviton, which is a massless tensor boson"
>
> > > > > How does an electromagnetic wave travel through nothing?
>
> > > > I'm afraid you will have to go back and study the basics. Start with
> > > > static electric and magnetic fields. They produce a force that has an
> > > > effect over a distance with no intervening medium.
>
> > Show me the experimental evidence where it is proven there is no
> > medium.
>
> > Why have the probability of a wave when you can have an actual wave in
> > the aether?
>
> An attempt to measure the motion of the earth through the aether:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trouton-Noble_experiment
>

Another experiment which was an "attempted to detect motion of the
Earth through the luminiferous aether."

This is the same concept of the MM Experiment and both concepts are
the opposite of aether displacement.

> This experiment counters the theory that the aether is 'dragged' along
> by the mass of the earth:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammar_experiment
>

Another experiment that is vastly different that aether displacement:

"instead of passing through a static and unmoving aether, massive
objects at the earth's surface may drag some of the aether along with
them"

"Oliver Joseph Lodge was one of the first to perform a test of this
theory by using massive lead blocks in an experiment that attempted to
cause an asymmetrical aether wind"

Here's the best quote:

"If there was any wind at all to be detected, the leg of the
interferometer with lead, should have experienced less wind than the
other leg."

So far, all of these experiments have done is failed to detect an
aether wind.

As stated previously stated all of this is evidence of aether
displacement.

> further experiments have been done to counter the argument that only
> planet or solar sized masses can produce such a drag by
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Joseph_Lodge
>

I did not see any experiments associated with this link.

> and others.
>
> The biggest nail in aether's coffin is that, despite its supporters
> attempts, the aether theory predicts no further useful or even
> verifiable phenomena. Unlike the Maxwell/Lorentz/Einstein theoretical
> support for non-aether EM wave propagation. This has been verified
> experimentally and makes additional hypothesis, may of which have also
> been confirmed experimentally.
>

There is one experiment that is evidence of an aether, but for some
reason, it is ignored.

And that experiment is the Double Slit Experiment which is explained
perfectly by aether displacement.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4c9f141c-1165-4c3f-af6a-27bdf8390b26@r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <3d1662b6-0a54-4865-9213-73a26373bc1e@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <495EBB4D.FD8B844D@hate.spam.net> <9276a1e6-7b26-41a9-8039-07675e481a0a@g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <495F999C.F868E4B1@hate.spam.net> <J6c8l.3172$BC4.2240@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> <c2ff700c-7707-480f-b66e-f2a8a68e1d6b@o4g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <4962C548.7D94ECF0@hovnanian.com> <E9B8l.3442$BC4.2110@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> <49658D7F.D7766809@hovnanian.com> <b43275c1-6e33-42db-aaef-31ea8c3df882@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com> <4966B078.FCFDEED2@hovnanian.com> <87c6e267-7400-4bb9-9799-563ff84992dd@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <496A4F6B.79DCFD30@hovnanian.com> <2bd3f323-41ce-4945-808c-3a4c37cf893c@p2g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <8e12cb94-3c32-403f-8b64-e3f7051731a7@g3g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <496BBA3F.AAF13C8D@hovnanian.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,32cfb6ca47c1b4ce
X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,a3e901d476b2158f
X-Google-Thread: 102f53,a3e901d476b2158f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid106b5d,gid102f53,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "mpc755@gmail.com" <mpc755@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,rec.org.mensa,cam.misc
Subject: Re: Aether Displacement
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:24:37 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 123
Message-ID: <4c9f141c-1165-4c3f-af6a-27bdf8390b26@r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
References: <3d1662b6-0a54-4865-9213-73a26373bc1e@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> 
 <495EBB4D.FD8B844D@hate.spam.net> <9276a1e6-7b26-41a9-8039-07675e481a0a@g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <495F999C.F868E4B1@hate.spam.net> <J6c8l.3172$BC4.2240@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
 <c2ff700c-7707-480f-b66e-f2a8a68e1d6b@o4g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
 <4962C548.7D94ECF0@hovnanian.com> <E9B8l.3442$BC4.2110@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
 <49658D7F.D7766809@hovnanian.com> <b43275c1-6e33-42db-aaef-31ea8c3df882@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
 <4966B078.FCFDEED2@hovnanian.com> <87c6e267-7400-4bb9-9799-563ff84992dd@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <496A4F6B.79DCFD30@hovnanian.com> <2bd3f323-41ce-4945-808c-3a4c37cf893c@p2g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <8e12cb94-3c32-403f-8b64-e3f7051731a7@g3g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
 <496BBA3F.AAF13C8D@hovnanian.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.217.7.38
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1231799078 32257 127.0.0.1 (12 Jan 2009 22:24:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:24:38 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=98.217.7.38; 
 posting-account=CGI-kwoAAABJMfbJbiK6GsrvOxUb3IBL
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) 
 Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)