🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 4, 11:23 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 11:11 am, john291208 <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 3, 9:05 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 3, 9:45 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 3, 1:21 am, UncleEnglish <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On 3 Jan, 01:11, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > > >Aetheris the lowest common denominator of matter.
>
> > > > > > [snip rest of crap]
>
> > > > > > idiot
>
> > > > > > "The two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and
> > > > > > stupidity," Harlan Ellison.
>
> > > > > > "Ordinarily he was insane, but he had lucid moments when he was merely
> > > > > > stupid," Heinrich Heine.
>
> > > > > > "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and
> > > > > > I'm not sure about the former," Albert Einstein.
>
> > > > > > "Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus
> > > > > > handicapped," Elbert Hubbard
>
> > > > > > "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain,"  Friedrich
> > > > > > von Schiller.
>
> > > > > > "There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity," Johann Wolfgang
> > > > > > von Goethe
>
> > > > > > "Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity,"
> > > > > > Stephen Vizinczey.
>
> > > > > > "Fools rush in where fools have been before," Unknown
>
> > > > > >http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
> > > > > > Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
> > > > > > <http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf>
> > > > > >  Noaether
>
> > > > > >http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/http://physicsweb.org/arti...
> > > > > > <http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-5/index.html>http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0287
> > > > > >  No Lorentz violation
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> > > > > >  (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
>
> > > > > There has to be a medium that is stable and then may be modulated to
> > > > > send signals, if all we have is physiological/bodily/mass presences.
>
> > > > > Outside that, maybe there is something else. Minds may well weigh
> > > > > nothing. Indeed, they quite possibly do not exist beyond the life of
> > > > > anyone's body!
>
> > > > >http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9pXjnn3aL2A&feature=related
> > > > > --
> > > > > foolsrushin.
>
> > > > Not sure I'm ready to jump on the "morphic resonance" band wagon, but
> > > > ouraetherdisplacements are interacting.
>
> > > > Obviously, it's hard enough trying to "bring backaether" without
> > > > jumping to philosophical and physiological realms, even though
> > > > acceptingaetheris philosophical at its core.
>
> > > > Aetherdisplacementis a much better explanation for the behaviors in
> > > > the Double Slit Experiment than quantum mechanics probability.
>
> > > Aether displacement is a much better explanation for the behaviors in
> > > the Double Slit Experiment than quantum mechanics probability and
> > > duality.
>
> > Aether displacement doesn't happen.
> > 'Displacement'  is something two materials do to each other.
> > Aether is not material. When aether is transformed into
> > matter by the addition of energy, then that matter will
> > displace something. But it won't be aether, because that's
> > what the matter is made from, or better, how the matter
> > 'is expressed' (in the connotation of a word.)
> > The aether stays where it is- like a movie screen
> > while energy moves through it in whatever patterns or non-patterns..
> > Nothing displaces it or is displaced by it
> >  However no other energy structure can
> > use all or some of the same aether to appear as
> > matter at the same time.(Some time-share eg molecules.)
> > You get the difference? You're talking apples and oranges,
> > or, better, chicken and egg.
>
> > john
>
> I don't see who the aether could ever stay where it is.
>
> That's why I think the Michelson–Morley experiment makes no sense.
>
> How can the aether flow freely through the earth?
>
> To me, the Michelson–Morley experiment is the same as trying to
> discover air by looking for wind so you stand a flag in the basement
> of a house with a stone foundation and when the flag doesn't wave, you
> conclude air doesn't exist.
>
> I don't see how you can think aether stays where it is like a moving
> screen.
>
> Anything that interacts with the movie screen is going to displace the
> movie screen.
>
> Aether is a form of matter. How can aether not be matter but be
> transformed into matter.
>
> Your explanation makes no sense.


The aether is the water.
The matter is the waves in the water.

When the wave travels, it continually
uses *different* water. It doesn't 'displace' the water already
there, it *expresses itself* in the new water.

When the movie plays on the screen, the screen
doesn't change or move- it just allows
you to see the images.

john
galaxy model