🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 4, 12:32 pm, john291208 <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 11:23 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 3, 11:11 am, john291208 <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 3, 9:05 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 3, 9:45 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jan 3, 1:21 am, UncleEnglish <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 3 Jan, 01:11, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >Aetheris the lowest common denominator of matter.
>
> > > > > > > [snip rest of crap]
>
> > > > > > > idiot
>
> > > > > > > "The two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and
> > > > > > > stupidity," Harlan Ellison.
>
> > > > > > > "Ordinarily he was insane, but he had lucid moments when he was merely
> > > > > > > stupid," Heinrich Heine.
>
> > > > > > > "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and
> > > > > > > I'm not sure about the former," Albert Einstein.
>
> > > > > > > "Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus
> > > > > > > handicapped," Elbert Hubbard
>
> > > > > > > "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain,"  Friedrich
> > > > > > > von Schiller.
>
> > > > > > > "There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity," Johann Wolfgang
> > > > > > > von Goethe
>
> > > > > > > "Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity,"
> > > > > > > Stephen Vizinczey.
>
> > > > > > > "Fools rush in where fools have been before," Unknown
>
> > > > > > >http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
> > > > > > > Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
> > > > > > > <http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf>
> > > > > > >  Noaether
>
> > > > > > >http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/http://physicsweb.org/arti...
> > > > > > > <http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-5/index.html>http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0287
> > > > > > >  No Lorentz violation
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> > > > > > >  (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
>
> > > > > > There has to be a medium that is stable and then may be modulated to
> > > > > > send signals, if all we have is physiological/bodily/mass presences.
>
> > > > > > Outside that, maybe there is something else. Minds may well weigh
> > > > > > nothing. Indeed, they quite possibly do not exist beyond the life of
> > > > > > anyone's body!
>
> > > > > >http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9pXjnn3aL2A&feature=related
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > foolsrushin.
>
> > > > > Not sure I'm ready to jump on the "morphic resonance" band wagon, but
> > > > > ouraetherdisplacements are interacting.
>
> > > > > Obviously, it's hard enough trying to "bring backaether" without
> > > > > jumping to philosophical and physiological realms, even though
> > > > > acceptingaetheris philosophical at its core.
>
> > > > > Aetherdisplacementis a much better explanation for the behaviors in
> > > > > the Double Slit Experiment than quantum mechanics probability.
>
> > > > Aether displacement is a much better explanation for the behaviors in
> > > > the Double Slit Experiment than quantum mechanics probability and
> > > > duality.
>
> > > Aether displacement doesn't happen.
> > > 'Displacement'  is something two materials do to each other.
> > > Aether is not material. When aether is transformed into
> > > matter by the addition of energy, then that matter will
> > > displace something. But it won't be aether, because that's
> > > what the matter is made from, or better, how the matter
> > > 'is expressed' (in the connotation of a word.)
> > > The aether stays where it is- like a movie screen
> > > while energy moves through it in whatever patterns or non-patterns..
> > > Nothing displaces it or is displaced by it
> > >  However no other energy structure can
> > > use all or some of the same aether to appear as
> > > matter at the same time.(Some time-share eg molecules.)
> > > You get the difference? You're talking apples and oranges,
> > > or, better, chicken and egg.
>
> > > john
>
> > I don't see who the aether could ever stay where it is.
>
> > That's why I think the Michelson–Morley experiment makes no sense.
>
> > How can the aether flow freely through the earth?
>
> > To me, the Michelson–Morley experiment is the same as trying to
> > discover air by looking for wind so you stand a flag in the basement
> > of a house with a stone foundation and when the flag doesn't wave, you
> > conclude air doesn't exist.
>
> > I don't see how you can think aether stays where it is like a moving
> > screen.
>
> > Anything that interacts with the movie screen is going to displace the
> > movie screen.
>
> > Aether is a form of matter. How can aether not be matter but be
> > transformed into matter.
>
> > Your explanation makes no sense.
>
> The aether is the water.
> The matter is the waves in the water.
>
> When the wave travels, it continually
> uses *different* water. It doesn't 'displace' the water already
> there, it *expresses itself* in the new water.
>
> When the movie plays on the screen, the screen
> doesn't change or move- it just allows
> you to see the images.
>
> john
> galaxy model

When an electron travels through the aether in the double slit
experiment, what do you think is happening?

I think the electron is creating a displacement wave in the aether.

The electron and aether interaction is frictionless.

It is the displacement wave that goes through both slits.

The electron goes through a single slit.

The displacement wave exits both slits and creates interference.

The path the electron is traveling is altered by this interference.

Firing electron after electron creates an interference pattern on the
screen.

No probability. No duality.