Re: Super!

Article View: sci.physics

Article #928

#928

From: RING, DAVID WAYNE
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 22:16

11 lines
960 bytes

matt@physics.berkeley.edu writes...
>This just means that non-supersymmetric SU(5) theories are ruled out,
>right?  My understanding was that there were still a number of viable
>SO(10) and E(6) models.  

You're probably right, it's so hard to keep up on these things. There are
of course many models which are not ruled out. But do any of them make any 
real predictions?

Dave Ring
dwr2560@zeus.tamu.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8AUG199217160900@zeus.tamu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!zeus.tamu.edu!dwr2560

References: <1992Aug4.135508.18583@galois.mit.edu> <4962@tuegate.tue.nl> <MATT.92Aug7221747@physics2.berkeley.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!zeus.tamu.edu!dwr2560
From: dwr2560@zeus.tamu.edu (RING, DAVID WAYNE)
Subject: Re: Super!
Message-ID: <8AUG199217160900@zeus.tamu.edu>
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Sender: news@tamsun.tamu.edu (Read News)
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
References: <1992Aug4.135508.18583@galois.mit.edu> <4962@tuegate.tue.nl> <MATT.92Aug7221747@physics2.berkeley.edu>
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 1992 22:16:00 GMT
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message