🚀 go-pugleaf

On Apr 24, 11:19 am, "kdth...@yahoo.com" <kdth...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
 http://climateaudit.org/

> Science is lies.    Vote for Senator Inhofe.


The workings of science? If the world of the scientific community
wishes to accept this as science, I guess they have the right to their
opinion.


''''''''''''''''''''''''''
 From Phil Jones, head of the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia
University, to Ray Bradley, Michael Mann, and Malcolm Hughes, three
U.S. scientists who have produced the controversial "hockey-stick
graphs" that purport to show rapidly increasing temperatures in
recent
decades. Nov, 16, 1999.

"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (i. e. from 1981 onwards) and
from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline."

""""""""""""""""""

- From: Keith Briffa, Sep 22, 1999


"I know there is pressure to present a nice tidy story as regards
'apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand years or more in the
proxy data' but in reality the situation is not quite so simple. We
don't have a lot of proxies that come right up to date and those that
do (at least a significant number of tree proxies ) some unexpected
changes in response that do not match the recent warming."

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 From Kevin Trenberth, a lead author with the UN's Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, to Michael Mann, on Oct 12. 2009. The email,
titled "BBC U-turn on climate," laments a BBC article that reversed
its long-held position on man-made global warming.

"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the
moment and it is a travesty that we can't. ... Our observing system is
inadequate."

"""""""""""""""""""""""
 From: Michael Mann, Oct 27, 2009

"Perhaps we'll do a simple update to the Yamal post... As we all know,
this isn't about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable
accusations."

""""""""""""""""""

- From: Phil Jones, Feb 2, 2005


"The two MMs [Canadian skeptics Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick]
have been after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear
there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I think I'll
delete the file rather than send to anyone."

""""""""""""""""""""""""""


- From: Phil Jones, May 29, 2008


"Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith
will do likewise. He's not in at the moment -minor family crisis. Can
you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don't have his new
email address. We will be getting Caspar to do likewise."

"""""""""""""""""""""""""
KD

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:19:43 -0700, kdthrge@yahoo.com wrote:


> Such brilliant insight from such great scientists as Jones, Mann, and
> Briffa.
>

Who couldn't have spiked the entire climate change argument better if
they'd been paid and planned it that way... hmm...

Dhu



-- 
Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu >>> Ne Obliviscaris

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.politics/tree/browse_frm/thread/e9a14a4b695b8d12/153e22aaad445e6a?hl=en&rnum=1&_done=%2Fgroup%2Faus.politics%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fe9a14a4b695b8d12%2Fcfbd25f0c2b81793%3Fhl%3Den%26#doc_153e22aaad445e6a

On Apr 24, 3:13 pm, "James" <kingko...@iglou.com> wrote:

> "kdth...@yahoo.com" <kdth...@earthlink.net> wrote in message

> > Such brilliant insight from such great scientists as Jones, Mann, and
> > Briffa.

> > In the US, we are thinking of carving their faces in the mountain next
> > to Mt Rushmore, for their devotion to saving us and our economy from
> > our foolish ways of enjoying fuel and energy.

> No can do. I think Gore bought the property for himself.-

I did hear something like that. He already has the sculptor, the
machinery and the crews ready to go on their holy mission to emulate
his most holy likeness into stone.

At the base will be the enscription, ' Back to Back Winner of two
consectutive Bozo of the Century awards'.

He'll have a smaller version of the scientists faces with their mouths
open, behind  him, as reference for his scientific statement

,,,"and scientists tell us,,,,".

The only problem is that every day he goes through multitudes of
photographers trying to find one who can get a working photo of his
face without that 'Grinch that stole Christmas', look on his face.

HAHAHAHAHhaHAHAHhHAHAhahahahahHAHAHAHA

KD

On Apr 28, 2:08 am, Duncan Patton a Campbell <campb...@neotext.ca>
wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:19:43 -0700, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Such brilliant insight from such great scientists as Jones, Mann, and
> > Briffa.
>
> Who couldn't have spiked the entire climate change argument better if
> they'd been paid and planned it that way... hmm...
>
> Dhu
>
> --
> Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu >>> Ne Obliviscaris

And now the remaining charlatans are trying to say that the works of
these scientists are not fundamental to the IPCC or that the proxies
are not fundamental to climatology, of which these scientists had
complete domination.

Without proxies, one does not have climatology at all, since
temperature records go back only 130 years at best. Not enough time to
develop any science at all in regards to climate.

Using the proxies is the only means that this theoretical science
exists at all.

And these scientists are also the core of the IPCC. The temperature
statistics from before 1950, and all of the theoretical 'corrections'
to the corrupted raw data.

If these scientists are not the basis for the IPCC, then the IPCC will
have no problem with eradicating any of their work, references or
postulations from theses charlatans.
This would only mean they have nothing.

At this point it is interesting to watch these fanatic idiots continue
in their obsession with screwing with other peoples use of fuel, so
accustomed they are to plying their lies and people believing in their
liquid horseshit.

KD