🚀 go-pugleaf

> "Suppose that you could reduce human suffering and prolong
> human life as the probable result of performing experiments that would
> require inflicting pain and death on several (non-human) animals, and
> that no other approach would succeed.  Would the experiments be justified?
> I don't think you need to post answers to this question, just think about
> what the appropriate criteria are."

Well I hate to tell you about something like this, since I'm not to answer this
question, but suppose you can reduce human suffering or prolong life.  What
good is there if you don't have anything to eat or other things.  The suffering
would also be that there wouldn't be anything to enjoy if life is prolong for a
long time.  You are suppose to enjoy life, because it's a gift to you as a
human, and you should not take it for granted.

Well since doctors can kill and torture animals, why can't humans kill humans.
It may be against the judgement of God, but what the Hell we can kill Gods
animals so why not kill ourselves.  The point is that everybody is forgetting
that we are also an animal, that God created.