🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.research
Article #582

Re: animals of research

#582
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 1988 00:54
17 lines
1376 bytes
In article <UWSA6EyS2k-01xc0=6@andrew.cmu.edu> jc5z+@andrew.cmu.edu (John L. Cusack) writes:
[Quoting my earlier posting:]
>> I don't think you need to post answers to this question, just think about
>> what the appropriate criteria are."
>It may be against the judgement of God, but what the Hell we can kill Gods
>animals so why not kill ourselves.  The point is that everybody is forgetting
>that we are also an animal, that God created.

The reason I suggested not posting answers is that I rather expected
this sort of argumentation.  It seems that when people's emotions get
involved, their ability to reason goes out the window.  The obvious
counterargument would be that many animals kill other animals as part
of nature's survival scheme.  In any case, the term "animal" was being
originally used to denote non-human animals, as was clear from context.

I don't know what the "sci.research" newsgroup is for, but this
probably isn't it.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7801@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!umd5!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
References: <UWSA6EyS2k-01xc0=6@andrew.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!umd5!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: sci.research
Subject: Re: animals of research
Message-ID: <7801@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: 30 Apr 88 00:54:56 GMT
References: <UWSA6EyS2k-01xc0=6@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 16