🚀 go-pugleaf

"|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote:

>"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@ratbags.com> wrote ...
>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@ratbags.com> wrote ...
>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>> OK, your problem as regards litigating against these organisations 
>>>>>>> before you have a contract with them, or getting a Fair Trading 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Isn't Peter's post a contractual offer to set up a test with me?
>>>>>
>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.out-of-body/msg/9ce14f8854504863?hl=en
>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>"|-|erc" <h...@c-h-e-s-s.com> wrote: 
>>>>>>Probably because I'm in Australia, though they claim to do 
>>>>>>local preliminary tests which noone has passed. 
>>>>>
>>>>>No problem being in Australia, Herc. 
>>>>>The Australian Skeptics have their own prize (it's only $100,000, but 
>>>>>it's still worth winning). 
>>>>>The rules are simple: 
>>>>>1) Tell us what you are going to do.
>>>> 
>>>> Did you do that in unambiguous terms?
>>>> 
>>>>>2) Tell us the conditions under which you can do it. For example, if 
>>>>>it only works on Fridays in rooms with red flock wallpaper we will 
>>>>>book a suite at Madame Heloise's House of Happiness (I have a frequent 
>>>>>flocker card).
>>>> 
>>>> Did you do that in unambiguous terms? Remember the protocol and
>>>> conditions have to be mutually agreed, but AS is prepared to
>>>> accommodate claimants' wishes as far as possible.
>>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>You got the protocol COMPLETELY wrong!
>> 
>> What protocol? You didn't agree to one.
>> 
>>>
>>>I don't send a registered letter with a scientific test protocol with pass and fail
>>>marks and objective unambiguous procedures.
>> 
>> You don't have to do that, but you do have to come to an agreement
>> over a "scientific test protocol with pass and fail marks and
>> objective unambiguous procedures". You didn't. You went straight to
>> "Pay me or I will poison food".
>
>
>Absolutely untrue!  As already stated you "invited" me to apply in Dec 2001.
>The poison comment was in March 2002.
>
>
>
>
>
>> 
>>>
>>>Look at your website - "tell us what you can do" THAT'S IT!
>> 
>> So, tell us what you can do and why it is paranormal.
>
>
>Quoting my first claim to A.S. back in 2001.
>
>I can state a question and get an answer from God from random quotes of information.
>
>That would imply using readily available quotes, not the names, ages and types
>of 10 of Barry's pets.  The answer is not quoted in any book!

A question was stated. You claimed to be able to "get an answer from
God from random quotes of information". You did not say that the
answer would be in any book, but that it would come "from God from
random quotes of information". You offered no random quotes. Therefore
you offered no answers. Therefore you failed a preliminary test and
nothing further needed to be done.

>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>I appreciate the change of tune on your behalf Pete, I always knew you had it in you
>but $100,000 is pocket change to me now, and nobody here is defending the reneging
>that went on in the Paranormal Dataset Cluster.

$100,000 is pocket change but you have to save up to buy an iPhone
cable?

>
>I can seduce Eve in private now!  
>
>Australia can continue being the US ass lickers they are all taken for a spin for.
>
>Herc
>
> 

-- 
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
I'm @RatbagsDotCom on Twitter