Article View: sci.skeptic
Article #5467Re: HOW I UNEQUIVOCALLY READ PETER BOW-DITCH'S (AUSTRALIAN SKEPTICS PRESIDENT) MIND
From: |-|ercules
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:31
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:31
50 lines
3434 bytes
3434 bytes
<dev.null@example.com> wrote > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 05:59:02 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >><dev.null@example.com> wrote ... > > why did you snip the url? > www.MINDREADING.com > > >>> That site is a lame con even for you. 1) think of a question and >>> provide an MD5 for it. 2) Submit 3 questions including the original >>> question. 3) Give me 24 hours to run MD5 on the 3 questions - must >>> include the original question. 4) Now herc claims mind reading >>> powers. >> >> >>The MD5 is only to be included in test results. You can skip page 2 and >>still test me out but it will only prove it to the telepathic asker, not publically. > >>I assume you can backup your claim of cracking an MD5 in 24 hours >>with a 15 digit numeric key appended to the question. > > I assume that you have reading comprehension problems. Show me where I > said I would crack an MD5. > So you're a skeptic but not a debunker? Standard debunker protocol, you duplicate my feat. If you think I can crack 15 digit keys then use 20 or 25 digits. Or don't use MD5 at all, keep your telepathically asked question all to yourself. In fact if I controlled a bot net with 100,000 PCs it could be possible to crack 15 digits. But my <<subjective answer>> to the question is publically determined and it has to match the question. So there is a public way to check my claim of getting the subjective answer and working backwards to figure out which question was asked. A subjective check, but that is my claim that the answer is obvious that anyone can match it to the right question. There is no way I can cheat. Herc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8gsehnFricU1@mid.individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<8gpueoFpknU1@mid.individual.net> <aqjga6di9jumvrhj4jahkeds5c95omubv7@4ax.com> <8gr264Fdc7U1@mid.individual.net> <nr2ha6d65frg2t3v137gu3d2djp3jpjh58@4ax.com> <8gs5kaF7b1U1@mid.individual.net> <emvha694nv3b6imabf025tstgs46dihe0i@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f44bc,3046fc42fa530145 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 116469,3046fc42fa530145 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 107787,3046fc42fa530145 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fe15b,3046fc42fa530145 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 10a774,3046fc42fa530145 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,3046fc42fa530145 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: giddc1377d6e,gideb4416e36f,gid2f40725cd2,gidf090d44e1a,gid3ac807a62f,gid3b9c5691a5,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.atheism,alt.paranormal,alt.astrology,aus.tv,rec.org.mensa Subject: Re: HOW I UNEQUIVOCALLY READ PETER BOW-DITCH'S (AUSTRALIAN SKEPTICS PRESIDENT) MIND Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 08:31:15 +1000 Lines: 50 Message-ID: <8gsehnFricU1@mid.individual.net> References: <8gpueoFpknU1@mid.individual.net> <aqjga6di9jumvrhj4jahkeds5c95omubv7@4ax.com> <8gr264Fdc7U1@mid.individual.net> <nr2ha6d65frg2t3v137gu3d2djp3jpjh58@4ax.com> <8gs5kaF7b1U1@mid.individual.net> <emvha694nv3b6imabf025tstgs46dihe0i@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net ZRUQBHsRKLJF/mkuj/RNcgvzVtiXJ7975r/hYY2b4rzsdtUiiQ Cancel-Lock: sha1:WU5+r8SJEKIIoWreffl2ezgHM9Q= In-Reply-To: <emvha694nv3b6imabf025tstgs46dihe0i@4ax.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726