🚀 go-pugleaf

<dev.null@example.com> wrote ...
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 08:31:15 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
>><dev.null@example.com> wrote
>>> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 05:59:02 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>><dev.null@example.com> wrote ...
>>> 
>>> why did you snip the url?
>>> www.MINDREADING.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> That site is a lame con even for you. 1) think of a question and
>>>>> provide an MD5 for it. 2) Submit 3 questions including the original
>>>>> question. 3) Give me 24 hours to run MD5 on the 3 questions - must
>>>>> include the original question.  4) Now herc claims mind reading
>>>>> powers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The MD5 is only to be included in test results.  You can skip page 2 and
>>>>still test me out but it will only prove it to the telepathic asker, not publically.
>>> 
>>>>I assume you can backup your claim of cracking an MD5 in 24 hours
>>>>with a 15 digit numeric key appended to the question.
>>> 
>>> I assume that you have reading comprehension problems. Show me where I
>>> said I would crack an MD5.
>>> 
>>
>>So you're a skeptic but not a debunker?
>>
>>Standard debunker protocol, you duplicate my feat.
>>
>>If you think I can crack 15 digit keys then use 20 or 25 digits.  Or don't use MD5 at all,
>>keep your telepathically asked question all to yourself.
> 
> I don't think you are cracking anything. 
> 
>>There is no way I can cheat.
>>
>>
>>Herc
>> 
> 
> then why are you snippping out where I point out how you are cheating?


I didn't snip anything.  How can I cheat?

I give the subjective answer to the question you think of, without any decision on my part,
I just look up the line number in the bible.

Guessing the question is just a bonus to give an objective measure of the correlation,
because skeptics won't make any attempt to measure the accuracy of the answers.

You think of a question, I answer it with a quote YOU TOLD ME TO LOOK UP.

I can't cheat, because I don't actually have input on what I do.  I'm just the medium.


Herc